cm0002True Love's Definition - [The Existential Comics]
leftzeroSounds more like something Diogenes would do, I think…
YummyYugiPresents ass, “Behold a pussy”
knightly the SneptaurFeatherlwss bipeds be like
MinnesotaGoddamthe orifice of champions
The difference being that Diogenes only would be doing this to show the Prince to be a fool and not be seeking further interaction except, perhaps, further mockery.
I also want to say that Diogenes was far more interested in women than he was in men, given that at least one of his affairs is fairly well known. The same cannot be said for Socrates.
Diogenes was far more interested in women than he was in men
Fair enough, Diogenes wouldn’t own a fancy dress either, but I was referring to the way that character argued and messed with the other one; it just seems to fit more with Diogenes than Socrates.
Holy fucking shit that ending got me SOO good XD
Loving regardless of physical appearance doesn’t follow from loving for more than just physical appearance.
Demisexual people don’t feel sexual attraction based on looks or appearance. Only when an emotional bond has been formed (usually based on personality), do they feel sexual attraction to another person.
I wouldn’t know, but I’d wager that they do feel sexually repulsed by some people though, just based on physical characteristics. Most people don’t desire to have sex with unclean people, for example. It’s just a natural factor of how we evolved, for health, safety, healthy offspring, whatever.
she was a trophy wife
Chivalry in a nutshell.
When I was a kid, I always get weirded out by stories/fables about princes saving princesses.
Like… Why can’t a Regent Queen save a man she likes? (oh yea patriarchy, fuck that shit)
zloubidaEven better!