The future of AI-powered software development is here!
https://github.com/Zorokee/ArtificialCast
(Warning: don't stop until you've read the text below the subheading, "Why This Exists")
The future of AI-powered software development is here!
https://github.com/Zorokee/ArtificialCast
(Warning: don't stop until you've read the text below the subheading, "Why This Exists")
@FlagrantError @cstross
Came here to say that.
(Good name you've got there, BTW)
Brilliant!
@cstross I can picture the vibe coders passing this along, because they don’t even read the readme, I bet
(They can’t understand it anyway, so why would they?)
I knew I was sold at "Testable & deterministic-ish - Works beautifully until it doesn't."
That's the type of reliability I demand in my software. Off to download it. Y'all have a nice day
The investors behind AI don't want functional code.
They want:
1. Orwellian state surveillance
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/09/omnipresent-ai-cameras-will-ensure-good-behavior-says-larry-ellison/
https://www.404media.co/larry-ellisons-ai-powered-surveillance-dystopia-is-already-here/
2. Melding of corporate interests & government
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/12/larry_ellison_wants_all_data/
3. Smoke & Mirrors Fraud
https://www.businessinsider.com/larry-ellison-2010-12#oracle-must-have-been-bit-by-the-curse-of-the-new-hq-by-1990-oracle-was-on-life-support-thanks-to-crappy-software-and-a-too-aggressive-sales-staff-10
4. Immortality for the rich, especially petrostate despots
https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/tech-tycoon-larry-ellison-increases-stake-in-oxford-nanopore-60z7kjrjf
https://theweek.com/science/the-billionaire-led-quest-for-immortality
5. Stop a fossil fuel phase out
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-15/ai-to-prop-up-fossil-fuels-and-slow-emissions-decline-bnef-says
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/02/23/ai-gas-trump-climate-fossil/
@cstross love this:
"Failure is indistinguishable from success: Outputs are correct in form, not in meaning."
This is cursed.
This is brilliant.
I fear the license will not be read nor honored, and we will see BIGPISS based "production" code at RSA next year.
If you don't care about data integrity, I suppose you could get some novel, potentially even interesting, results from this, but more in line with good performance art than software engineering.
This is fascinatingly awful, and I'm in awe of the author putting the time into making this.
I think we're all accelerationists now. We didn't sign up for it, but here we are.
What are the odds that someone didn't read the docs, but just went straight to compile&run...? 🤦♂️ 🤣
@stevel @cstross "It still generates arrays sometimes."
https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/1klo4ng/comment/ms43cyg

@cstross Thank you for sharing this!
That "NOT FOR USE LICENSE" is exceptionally fit for purpose.
@cstross 😅
I like how the tone of the README is very serious at the beginning and derails more and more, with the tipping point being:
"Testable & deterministic-ish - Works beautifully until it doesn't."
It's the same result with longer LLM output - the longer the more bullshit - what beautiful symmetry.
Pure Art! ✨
Thank you for sharing.
@cstross Well getting me to sign up to any platform is difficult nowadays. But I felt a need to say thanks for the just amazing feedback I've read here - so thank you.
(p.s. i am so sorry for creating this sin against computing)
> It works. Until it doesn't. And when it doesn't, it fails in ways that look like success. That's the danger.
💯
@cstross almost a formal specification for bullshit.
I feel like the defining characteristic of our era is bullshit. And that’s why very smart people are pushing this on us so hard.