Microsoft: We write 30% of code using Gen AI.

The rest of the world: That explains the current state of Windows 11, MS-Office and all other products.

#ai

@nixCraft

This! ⬇️
„ In the 1950s and 60s, programmers wrote assembly code, where a single line might represent just one CPU instruction; by the 1970s, higher-level languages like C allowed programmers to express algorithms more concisely, increasing productivity dramatically“

nobody wants to write assembly to create a websites.

#AI is a tool. Higher productivity, yes. But it won’t replace devs. It will make it feasible to write software for business processes where it was to expensive.

@tobi82 @nixCraft What you say means #AI does replace devs: "too expensive" for software always means "the cost of labour is too high". If a dev with AI can do the work of 10 devs without AI then the AI has replaced 9 devs.

@wim_v12e @nixCraft

That’s not how it worked in the past. We have more devs today employed than ever, despite efficiency gains since the 60‘ or the 2000‘ when I started.

I currently build forms for a city council.Taxes for dogs, school change, and so on. They have 700 processes like this. We will build forms for 60 of them. The rest will be a pdf upload.

Because it would be too expensive to do all 700.

So AI wouldn’t cost us jobs, it would just enable us to do more.

@wim_v12e @nixCraft

At least now - the demand and created demand by automation will not cost the jobs of devs.

But it may cost jobs of those who do the automated tasks today.