I whish this article could be mandatory reading to those joining the Fediverse (& on all social platforms), & it was a good reminder for me on my own interactions.

"But rather than a naively utopian, Pollyannaish approach to debate, Dennett points out this is actually a sound psychological strategy that accomplishes one key thing: It transforms your opponent into a more receptive audience for your criticism or dissent, which in turn helps advance the discussion."

https://www.themarginalian.org/2014/03/28/daniel-dennett-rapoport-rules-criticism/

How to Criticize with Kindness: Philosopher Daniel Dennett on the Four Steps to Arguing Intelligently

“Just how charitable are you supposed to be when criticizing the views of an opponent?”

The Marginalian
@tchambers I wonder if Daniel Dennett is still unaware that scientific study of religion has existed for hundreds of years and it is called theology. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaking_the_Spell_(Dennett_book)
I guess he means distinction between humanities and (natural) sciences. Then again, psychology is often included in humanities. In European tradition philosophy is also included in humanities.
Breaking the Spell (Dennett book) - Wikipedia