Boy, Canada has a big problem. We've got a new PM that uses complex sentence structures and it looks like we need a huge upgrade to our fifth estate so they're capable of parsing them.
This seems to be a widespread problem, not confined to just the alt-right contingent of "reporterish" tools.
Filed under: "No, your takeaway is that I just gave you a comprehensive answer to your question."
Remember Canada's Press has the same problem as rhe US. Canadian papers, 98% are owned by American far right Repiblcan who is planning to betray us to Trump. Is betraying us.
Same == Same
Post Media is Chatham, Chatham is Republican in court with Trump for election malfeasance.
Post Media scroll to Assets
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmedia_Network
Canadian Papers are American.
They bought our papers ON PURPOSE
What is a Fifth Column?
@kevinrns That covers the right and alt-right but I've seen more than one actually independent reporter read "at the moment I am more concerned with X than Y" as "Carney is abandoning Y".
I think they're so accustomed to either more direct statements or answers that pivot to their sound-bite talking points that they've become incapable of understanding something as complex as a temporal conditional.They also seem incapable of formulating a follow-up in real time, like for example "does this mean you're abandoning Y?" A question for which they'd probably get another comprehensive answer.
They fire good reporters, leave up some good reporters as decorations.
They intend to play down the threat, play down allies actions of support, be "disappointed" - cite irrelavancies, the LATimes seemed like a real paper, the Washington Post had a clever "democracy" meme.
But betrayal was intent. Canada's US owned Papers are EXACTLY as subversive as US Coup papers.
This is them.
Alan Langford ๐จ๐ฆ๐งค๐งๆ
Kevin Russell