Cost of space launches to low Earth orbit

An interactive visualization from Our World in Data.

Our World in Data
Space launch market competition - Wikipedia

Launch costs have fallen 95% πŸ“‰ (with another massive reduction expected in the coming years) thanks to reuse, improved engineering, and increased volumes.
β€œIn economics, we assume that resources are limited; land is limited; natural resources are limited. With #space 🌌, it allows us to change that.” https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/may/03/were-in-a-new-era-the-21st-century-space-race-takes-off

#LaunchCost #SpaceMining

β€˜We’re in a new era’: the 21st-century space race takes off

As humans enter what has been termed the β€˜third space age’, it’s private companies – not governments – leading the charge

The Guardian

πŸ“Š The #US πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ spent $257 billion πŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’° when adjusted for inflation to 2020 dollars on Project #Apollo between πŸ“† 1960 and πŸ“† 1973. The total amount spent on #NASA during this period was $482 billion πŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’° adjusted https://www.planetary.org/space-policy/cost-of-apollo

#SaturnV #LaunchCost

How much did the Apollo program cost?

A rich data set tracking the costs of Project Apollo, free for public use. Includes unprecedented program-by-program cost breakdowns, facilities…

The Planetary Society
#Apollo-II, the first spacecraft that brought men to the lunar πŸŒ™ surface, had used a honeycomb shock absorber.
According to the study, the honeycomb structure is the most efficient and reliable geometry to provide energy absorption and load protection to the structure leading to intentionally plastic deformation of a designated element. When loaded, the respective element deforms plastically and proportionally to stroke https://thescipub.com/pdf/jastsp.2021.41.50.pdf