Did y'all hear?

Another Insurance CEO was almost killed at his home.

Is it a policy to not post news about copycats? (Which is a common policy) Or is it that they don't want overwhelming public support for it again?

"The home of State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) CEO Chip Terhune in Lake Oswego, near Portland, was shot up in the early hours of Feb. 21, the Lake Oswego Police Department said Wednesday."

https://www.fox9.com/news/saif-chip-terhune-insurance-ceo-bullets-oregon.amp

In my opinion, it's not that they fear another CEO's death. CEOs are replaceable. It's that they don't want another anti-hero in the news.

EDIT: Replies are arguing based on the term "anti-hero" without acknowledging the definition of the word, confusing it with the term hero.
Here's the definition of anti-hero: An "antihero" is a main character in a story who lacks the typical heroic qualities like strong morals, selflessness, and idealism, often making questionable decisions while still being the protagonist.

Would the news sharing this information make the suspect in the story a main character? Yes.
Would this person possibly be applauded because it mirrors other recent events? Yes.
Does that term mean we think the person is a hero? No. That's literally not the definition.

Before telling someone to "do their research" or the like, try Googling (or using your preferred search engine) first.

Insurance CEO's home riddled with bullets; gunman remains on the run | FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul

SAIF CEO Chip Terhune said he received a threatening email from the purported gunman in a message to company employees.

@dnsprincess One major problem with this one is that SAIF is a "good" insurance company. It is a state-chartered nonprofit insurance company that only does workers comp. It has a mandate to NOT deny-by-default. Any profit it would earn is returned to policyholders.

Also, there was a threat against dozens/hundreds of employees and their family members. (An extended family member of mine is an employee included in the list - the list included employee family members's parents, kids, siblings, and more - including my address, and I've never worked for any insurance company.) This threat was made the day after the shooting by email, claiming to be the shooter.

I'm no fan of our insurance system and think for-profit insurance needs to die a swift and painful-to-investors death; but threatening distant family members of low-level insurance company employees who have no part in insurance claims is way beyond the pale.

@ehurtley I'm in no way supporting the behavior with the post, didn't remark on it.

My post is to question why I haven't seen this in the mainstream media.

I don't think threatening the lives of the innocent is okay.

@dnsprincess Yeah, this was a strange one. It was barely covered even by local news. I have a feeling it was absolutely "to avoid copycat/glorifying".

If it had been another local similar-size company CEO? I bet it would have been major news for at least a full week.

@dnsprincess Yeah, this wasn't meant to find fault with your post. Just commenting on how this one was different.

@dnsprincess people really need to do basic research before cheering.

SAIF is literally a not-for-profit state-chartered insurance *policy* organization that does WORKER'S COMP and nothing else. The board is APPOINTED by the governor of Oregon.

In other words: this was political or someone upset about a claim. There is no 'anti-hero' here.

@rootwyrm "An antihero is a main character in a story who lacks traditional heroic qualities. They may be flawed, have made bad decisions, and have a questionable moral code."

Yeah, I'd say this is main character energy with with a bad moral code. Seems like the definition to me.

@dnsprincess another anti-hero is among us.
@dnsprincess
Nothing hero bout shooting at a house
The dude, who knows who he was, so many people wear hoodies, took aim at one person
Shot that person
Shooting at a house is for cowards and scumbags

@Sable_Shade Addressed in a different comment, but while there's nothing heroic about it, and I don't condone it either, the definition of an anti-hero is loosely someone with main character energy with a bad moral code.

This person views themselves, likely, as a main character trying to accomplish something.

I think we need to detach from the idea that we have to approve of such a label. You can find the definition I'm using with Google. Maybe your definition is different

@dnsprincess
gurple?
Never touch the stuff
Smells of scummery and dupes
No, when I want to know what someone is, I look at their actcions
Hoodie man, who knows who he really is, his face is never seen in the footage, had a problem with someone, some sphere of someones. And hoodie woman(? who really knows) took steps to make remedy and statement.
Housey bang bang wank, shot at a house. Unseen, the innards, and ran
No care for target
No care for peripheral consequence
Coward
Scumbag

@Sable_Shade So your reply sounds like a critique of the actions of the person in the article.

The post is a commentary on how the news isn't covering it. Why didn't they? Would the story if told sound like something the general public may laud, due to other past events? Yes.

I think you should revisit the original post and re-read it.

If you wanna change topics, that's fine, but don't expect your last response to be taken as context to the original post.

@dnsprincess
No
No critique of the person
Statement of what the person did
And therefore is!
No change of topic
My critique is of your original toot and the words you used
You, named him/they "anti-hero"
A coward is coward
A scumbag a scumbag
Calling someone that shoots in a general direction of some thing, is of no use to anyone or anything and needs to be labelled so
Just as a stiff arm gesture is as bullshit as all great america-ing that's going on right now
@Sable_Shade I don't think we're going to see eye to eye on this. I'll stick with the definition, you can argue into the void.
@dnsprincess
Unlike you, it seems
I am able talk without thinking it's an argument
I did not see it as eye level, either
You chose to use the anti-hero lable, in your opinion
K, bye

@dnsprincess

That doesn't surprise me in any way whatsoever. One reason Musk has had his security upgraded to SS level protection is because he and his destructive greedy insatiable ilk atre in severe peril. From a strictly demographic POV, there are many many old guys for whom time is running out and they have little to lose in a country being led by tyrannists anarchists and borderline Communists (Republicans). They've allowed the usurpation of the 2nd Amendment to be hijacked by the merchants of death and have proliferated gun availability to an inordinately unnatural level and some are going to pay dearly, even if it means taking out their bodyguards too. I am not an advocate of violence, but I am a psychologist, pragmatist and realist. The Supreme Court recently approved of bump stocks that convert AK 47 type long guns into weapons of war - machine guns.

The disturbed state of the USA
Some parts of the USA have bought into the vigilante mindset that there are so many unbalanced disturbed people with guns that there is a need to have an equal to or greater amount of armed “good guys" prevalent to counter the threat, which only proliferates the weapons and creates a greater likelihood for violence.
kwr©

@sobroquet @dnsprincess

This person has no idea what the words "anarchists" and "Communists" even mean.

Linknation (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 video #JesseWelles is really the #music #prophet of these days? #unitedhealth #healthcare for #profit #song #riseup and demand what is yours or #capitalism will #privatize and steal it

Infosec Exchange
@dnsprincess lack of coverage is definitely intentional
@dnsprincess almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

@dnsprincess
One obvious reason the SAIF shooting didn't get much coverage is that no one was injured.

The other is that - as other's have noted - this isn't an insurance company. It's an Oregon state agency that regulates compensation for injured workers. It's not controversial and doesn't have or deserve enemies like private for-profit insurance companies do.

@dnsprincess basically real life Deadpool’s without the regeneration
@dnsprincess I read it on AP last night, so I don't think there is much of an attempt to keep it quiet. Isn't SAIF the state run insurer of last resort and not a for-profit entity? That could explain the difference in the response.