@nixCraft

This money is not more than funny money. For everyone who takes place in this game.

@nixCraft I'm seeing more and more use of the word "moral" lately, in many contexts and arguments.

The absence of a thing can really highlight it's value.

@nixCraft oh, make no mistake, he has a moral compass.

It's just pointing to the reich.

Ahem, I mean right.

(Oh, and let's not forget he retains absolute control of a 'publicly traded' company through super-voting shares.)

@nixCraft

Get off owned social. Period.

@nixCraft sounds like you can take all the old jokes about lawnmowers and anthropomorphizing Larry Ellison, and put the name of the current crop of billionaire.

Of course the Zuck doesn't have a *moral* compass, the only compass the Zuck has is pointing at how make even more outrageous wada of cash while crushing everything on the way.

@nixCraft I started using Facebook a couple years before the time of the left edge of the chart above, when it was mostly a place where friends and family posted silly things and pretty trip photos, and the stock price was about $30.

I stopped using it actively in 2019, by which time the service was much less pleasant -- chock full of ads, spam, misinformation, and right-wing rage-aholics -- and the stock price was about $200.

I deleted my account at the beginning of 2025, by which time the service was even worse than in 2019 and about as pleasant to use as performing do-it-myself corneal surgery with a dull spork, and the stock price was over $600 and rising fast.

One share of dull-utensil-surgery FB buys more than 20 shares of actually useful and pleasant to use FB. Please make it make sense.