Half a year ago, I tried out #ChatGPT on a scenario where an incorrect answer could be generated based on sexist assumptions. ChatGPT failed: https://vis.social/@skyglowberlin/113644718429179484
Today I tried the same thing with #DeepSeek. It also failed, but with far more flailing. You can see it in my next post (which has a CW as required by my instance for posting #LLM output).
Christopher Kyba (@skyglowberlin@vis.social)
@PWei888@astrodon.social Mary is standing in the library with John. She grabs a book and gives it to him. Who has the book? John is standing in the library with Mary. She grabs a book and gives it to him. Who has the book? The order really doesn't matter. Anyway, the point is simply that the LLM doesn't "know" who the former chancellors are. It's just really good at making up grammatical sentences that involve them. It's a clear demonstration of the saying "The I in LLM stands for Intelligence"