The U.S. government questioning Native Americans' birthright citizenship isn’t just a bureaucratic issue—it’s a fundamental attack on Indigenous sovereignty. Native people are dual citizens: members of our sovereign nations first and foremost, with U.S. citizenship imposed on us in 1924 to erode that sovereignty. Now, the state is threatening to claw back even this imposed recognition, undermining treaty obligations and the legal frameworks that acknowledge our nations’ existence.

This is settler colonialism in action—using laws to erase and control. We’ve always existed as independent peoples, long before the U.S. imagined itself into being, and we’ll continue to exist regardless of what the settler state decides. This fight isn’t about fitting into their system; it’s about defending our right to govern ourselves on our terms.

https://www.salon.com/2025/01/23/excluding-indians-admin-questions-native-americans-birthright-citizenship-in/

#LandBack #IndigenousSovereignty

"Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court

The Trump admin is leaning on a pre-14th Amendment law in its fight to redefine birthright citizenship.

Salon.com

@emsenn quite clearly if a Native American commits a crime they are subject to the US legal system in exactly the same way as the European settlers so quite plainly they are under US jurisdiction.

To argue otherwise would be to suggest they are above US law .

@peterbrown @emsenn well, not exactly. BIA police handle specifically native issues. That’s a federal bureau, no other group I know of gets that.
@passwordsarehard4 @emsenn a USA federal bureau? does that not mean they’re under USA jurisdiction? Or is it just a way of depriving them of a vote, like Puerto Rico?
@peterbrown @emsenn it is, at least to the extent that I understand it, but it isn’t just like European originated citizens have either. They do have some differences and they are major enough to warrant a bureau to maintain them.