We’re thrilled to introduce the NVDA Add-On Reference GPT—a game-changer for the NVDA community! 🎉
Whether you're a developer building new NVDA add-ons or a user trying to find the perfect add-on to meet your needs, this tool has you covered.
Key Features:
• For Developers: Get guidance on creating NVDA add-ons, from start to finish. No more guesswork—let GPT help you code smarter!
• For Users: Easily discover add-ons that enhance your NVDA experience.
Try it Now: (1/2)
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-6793cf8dd038819198851e790dcce77f-nvda-addon-reference
💖 Support Our Work:
Love what we’re doing? Help us continue building accessible tools by donating!
https://techopolis.kit.com/products/gpt-donation
Have Feedback?
We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts and help us make this even better.
#Accessibility #NVDA #AIForGood #AssistiveTechnology #OpenSource #NVDAAddons #InclusiveTech #TechForChange (2/2)
ChatGPT - NVDA Addon Reference

Developer assistant for NVDA add-ons, teaching and creating accessible code.

ChatGPT
@tayarndt this is so superb, I might use this when making my synthesizer add-ons in the future, so really big thanks for making a GPT for it. I needed something that had better reference for it to train from rather than sometimes confusing old add-on conventions with new NVDA 2023 and beyond (py3) ones. So yes, badly and greatly needed!
@Tamasg For what it's worth, I asked for the code of four different types of add-on. All of them contained inaccuracies, and none of them worked. The simplest was one to add a "Restart NVDA" item to the main menu.
@jscholes wow! Yeah, I think with my synth work I just got lucky because I had a lot of simpler synth frameworks to go off of, like Brailab, knew enough about self-correcting it for it to not trash things up horribly, but even if this had imported every single working modern add-on I still think it would make those errors. Some of the wrong training data will still "seap in" to the model's tuning and it's just stuff you can't erase or have it ignore when processing the information, I think that's the biggest issue with the custom-GPT stuff. I've seen better results of this with direct API embedding though, we're using that at my work with some tools and it has a lot more strict framework to only process the info from the work docs we've fed it, which is interesting, but it's also done at that API level.
@tayarndt Nice. What did you feed it as resources? I've seen a few add-ons like this.
@Jage I gave it the add-on manual, the user guide and the developer resources and the add-on store