Policymakers in every other country should look at this and consider how it is any different to PRISM.
@mnot I'd argue that to some extent the EU did precisely this as a consequence of Schrems… but alas decided that the solution lay in the hands of policymakers & the law rather than "let's fix the technology to not be vulnerable to content surveillance in the first place".
Their choice of this path being informed by:
(a) "we are policymakers/lawyers, this is what we do", &
(b) "if we let them fix the technology, it prevents OUR surveillance, too" &
(c) "let's spank the American techbros"