@continentia_verlag @icil Suzanne Simard's book anthropomorphises tree characteristics. This has been blasted by a scientific paper, because some of the data in that book is not based on scientific evidence, and which contradicts established knowledge: https://www.cell.com/trends/plant-science/abstract/S1360-1385(23)00272-8
And Hans-Peter Durr was a physicist that somehow wanted to bridge a holistic worldview between science and spirituality, suggesting in some aspects that there's some form of underlying intelligence or consciousness that connects all forms of life and ecosystems - none of this is scientifically sound and requires heavy amounts of actual evidence.
Just because trees happen to 'cooperate' by exchanging sugars and nutrients, does not mean it's something anywhere close to some form of 'intelligence' or 'wisdom'.
Just because some things happen, that helps ecosystems thrive, that helps life move forward, evolve, etc, does not mean there's something intelligent or conscious there. Philosophy and science should remain separate.