The corporations can rent them indefinitely, can sell if the market is good, can use them as an asset/collateral for loans, and can sell in a down market and take a tax write off.
If they do sell, it might only be a shell game where an investor in the selling company sells to another company they own. If they sell at a lower price, the assessed value goes down, so the buying company pays less property tax.
Their financial options beggar the rest of us.
@davesomebody @hacks4pancakes this is the wrong way to think about things. Corporations are malthusian. There is no end game, they just keep consuming resource to reproduce themselves until they destroy their environment and catastrophically collapse.
Malthusian organisms with no predators caused one of the first great extinctions, now they're causing the 6th. They will also die. They are not self aware so they don't actually care.
@davesomebody @hacks4pancakes Some are buying them up more to rent to the plebes, for passive income. So especially w/ rents coming in, they could buy a ton more in the slump (for cheap)…
Even if that fails and a billionaire has lost (seriously) 90% of their assets, no one with 100 mil would ever need to worry about any slump.
Some folks are just addicted to more, more, more, $$$ because they've totally lost the plot of how to be decent people..
@davesomebody @hacks4pancakes Two things: at the logistics/rationalization level, they're likely counting on monopoly power to manipulate the supply side to get the price they want.
Second: check your theory of mind. I strongly suspect that most billionaires have some neurodivergence grade fundamental brain architecture differences from most of the population. The greedy maw is a hardware feature that cannot be turned off and the real problem: point one is just how they bullshit themselves.