Sarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
I got a chance to watch this video and...wow. She says that her #ScheduleA aren't expensive because they're on contingency (which we always suspected) and, in fact, make her money. Interesting comments too about how the defendants are "batched" (unsurprisingly, nothing about them working together).

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:t6rqrjrhcvlv6fosnsfxr7io/post/3kty6gf7hpm2v
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
Show threadSarah Fackrell
Of course, as with the Luke Combs comments, something may be lost in translation between the attorneys and their clients. But it's still fascinating to hear what those clients say publicly. If you see other examples, please send them my way.
Jan 4, 2025 at 2:39pmWeb
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
So far, I've only been able to find two Schedule A cases about RobeCurls (filed by Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP on behalf of "Emikeni Inc. formerly known as: Straplets Inc.")
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
It looks like one of them was initially filed under a pseudonym ("EK") so there may be others that I'm not seeing.
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
In the video, she also talks about patents but I'm only seeing copyright cases.
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
She does have patents, though:
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
Not seeing any lawsuits, of any type, file over either patent.
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
It's worth noting that both of these design patents contain *extremely* narrow claims.
Show threadSarah FackrellJan 4, 2025
This inventor has other (shoe-related) design patents, including this one. #FashionLaw
Bluesky

Bluesky Social