Thereâs a difference in how âcensorshipâ is conducted on, say, Lemmy.world vs Hexbear.net. Lemmy.world does soft censorship, they outright defederated from the 2 largest leftist instances. In a manner, this can be seen as banning every account from the 2 largest leftist instances, an extreme act of censorship, but it isnât recognized as such because it is soft. Outright removals of comments and posts are seen as hard censorship, as you remove viewpoints and people, which Hexbear does frequently with liberals and other right-wingers.
Lemmy.world uses this curated audience as a ânarrative ecosystem,â by removing any input from the largest leftist instances, thereâs no real leftist pushback against the dominant liberal narrative, and when there is, it usually gets heavily downvoted or removed. Hexbear on the other hand takes a more honest approach, and just says outright that liberalism isnât allowed and is bannable.
I wouldnât say the leftist communities are more heavy handed, but that they are more honest and forthright with how they exert control over their communities, itâs more transparent.