Why are distribution packagers obtuse about naming library packages python3-dostuff instead of libdostuff? If there's already a libdostuff, why not either (a) call it package libdostuff-ng, if it's actually a next-gen improvemnet, or (b) libdostuff-py, if it's simply an independent implementation?
How this helps anyone outside maybe ego deficient python language developers, and them not much, I can't guess.
I mean, nobody at netlib's asking for their software to be called fortran-lapack. I hope. And if they are, don't take them seriously.
#python #minirant #packaging