Health benefits of pedestrian and cyclist commuting: evidence from the Scottish Longitudinal Study

If ever you doubted that #cycling was good for you, doubt no longer!

#biketoot #biketooter #Scotland

https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e001295

Health benefits of pedestrian and cyclist commuting: evidence from the Scottish Longitudinal Study

Background Despite active travel investment increasing, evidence of benefit is often limited to selected health outcomes and a short follow-up period, and cyclists and pedestrians are often analysed together. We aimed to examine prospective associations with multiple health outcomes over 18 years for pedestrians and cyclists separately.Methods The Scottish Longitudinal Study is based on census data, from which we selected 82 297 individuals aged 16–74 years. Individuals were followed-up between 2001 and 2018 through linkage to hospitalisation, death and prescription records. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare cyclist and pedestrian commuters with non-active commuters for a range of health outcomes, controlling for pre-existing health conditions, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Results Compared with non-active commuting, cyclist commuting was associated with lower all-cause mortality risk (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.73), lower risk of any hospitalisation (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97), lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalisation (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91) and of having a CVD prescription (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.78), lower risk of cancer mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.82) and cancer hospitalisation (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98), and lower risk of having a prescription for mental health problems (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89). Pedestrian commuting was associated with lower risk of any hospitalisation (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.93), lower risk of CVD hospitalisation (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96) and of having a CVD prescription (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93), and lower risk of a mental health prescription (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.97).Conclusion Active commuters were less likely to suffer from a range of negative physical and mental health outcomes than non-active commuters. These findings strengthen the evidence for the health benefits of active commuting.

BMJ Public Health
@geomannie @geomannie Nice! Now we just need to move that “traffic causality hospitalisation” bar to the left. It’s good to see that even with those accidents included, the “all cause mortality” of cyclists is much lower than people on average.
@jfparis @joncounts @geomannie the 'traffic casualty' risk is purely infrastructure. We know how to Engineer this, it's simple & cheap. What we need to figure out is how to get politicians to care. That's the trick.
@Niall @jfparis @geomannie Turns out that's quite the trick though.
@geomannie How should I read this graph? Does 0.53 overall hazard ratio mean that cyclists have (on average) a 47% reduction of hospitalization over non-cyclists in any given year?
@geomannie twice the risk of getting flattened huh?
@InsertUser That is what the stats are saying, but you have to distinguish relative risk from absolute risk. The absolute risk of hospitalisation for anyone commuting is low. Doubling of a low risk is still a low risk.
@geomannie TBH after a skim of it it looks like they controlled for health just by looking at whether you've been in hospital in the last five years. This doesn't do much to dispell my gut instinct that this is just a graph showing that people who are already healthier are more likely to choose cycling that those who aren't.