If you love Richard Feynman you've got to watch this video...

... where Angela Collier will ruthlessly dissect the mythology he built around himself. You probably won't agree with everything she says, and you may hate some of it, but it will still be thought-provoking.

I didn't know about what she calls "Feynman bros": lazy male students who read Surely You Must Be Joking, Mr. Feynman! and try to adopt the flashy womanizing persona he depicts there, instead of working hard on physics. I can easily believe they exist. So if you know a youngster who likes physics, don't give them that book. Instead do what my uncle did: give them The Feynman Lectures on Physics.

I didn't know these books and indeed every book 'by Feynman' was actually written by his Caltech colleague Robert Leighton or his son Ralph Leighton based on audiotapes of lectures or conversations. I still don't know how much of a role Feynman had in crafting these concoctions.

I *did* know that he once flew into a rage and tried to choke his second wife.

I did not know he was good with children, eagerly answering letters from them, etc. It's nice that Collier points out this good side.

I *did* notice, from his anecdotes, that he put a huge amount of work into trying to seem like a manly man rather than a nerd.

I didn't fully notice that almost none of his anecdotes feature the famous physicists he worked with at the Manhattan Project. Collier points out that this leaves him free to make things up.

I think she overlooks how he eagerly *points out* that he used tricks to seem smart. He explains the tricks to show they're not so hard.

I could go on....

(1/2)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKpj2ISQAc

the sham legacy of Richard Feynman

Link to Patreon — one exclusive video per month:https://www.patreon.com/acollierastroI have merch: https://store.dftba.com/collections/angela-collierLink to ...

YouTube

Michael Gottlieb (@feynmanlectures), editor of the new edition of the Feynman lectures, has written a letter strongly disagreeing with some things Collier says in her video. You can see it here:

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/info/other/Letter_to_John_Baez_regarding_Angela_Colliers_sham_video.pdf

I was not implicitly endorsing all of @acollierastro's claims in my first post. I merely said what I wanted to say.

Nor am I implicitly endorsing Gottlieb's claims here. I hope Gottlieb and Collier can discuss this without using me as an intermediary.

(2/2)

@johncarlosbaez @acollierastro @feynmanlectures I watched all three hours of Angela's video, and that letter doesn't do anything to address the important parts.

She outlined plenty of evidence that the "Surely you're joking" stories are false. The problems those books cause are independent of truth of the stories, and the letter says nothing about that.

@overeducatedredneck @johncarlosbaez @acollierastro

My letter mainly concerns the distortions, omissions and lies Angela makes about the books I edit, author and publish.

Please detail the "evidence" you refer to that the stories in SYJ are false.

@feynmanlectures @johncarlosbaez @acollierastro Her evidence is in the video. I'd tell you to take it up with her, but given your defense of SYJ, I hope she's already blocked you. As I'm going to. As JWZ says, *plonk*.