And with "reiserfs: The last commit", #reiserfs is now gone from #Linux for 6.13:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/fb6f20ecb121cef4d7946f834a6ee867c4e21b4a
63 files changed, 12 insertions, 32804 deletions
Bye bye! 👋
And with "reiserfs: The last commit", #reiserfs is now gone from #Linux for 6.13:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/fb6f20ecb121cef4d7946f834a6ee867c4e21b4a
63 files changed, 12 insertions, 32804 deletions
Bye bye! 👋
Everything could have gone better.
I think that was back in the ext3 days when SuSE made it the standard.
SUSE Pre 7.0 I think it was.
Well then.
We then had ext2 with journaling, ext3, then came ext4 and now there is a nice selection.
But I still wonder what could have become of ReiseFS
@Seraphyn it's the usual I'd say:
it's not necessary the best technique that makes it, as a lot of other factors (developer interaction, good or bad public opinion due to real or neglectable aspects, a ton of others things) matter as well.
I wonder if anyone else still remembers Everybody loves Eric Raymond, A comic featuring esr, rms, Linus and others.
Hah, yes, I remember that one. 😄
Remind me again, where were those published? Linux Journal?
/me wonders how long it took @jani to find this one in the depths of the net… 😬
@jann even as regression tracker I tend to think:
removal is fine: if nobody complains, great! And if somebody does just put it back.
So called "scream test". Remove/disable something and wait for someone to start screaming to see who was using it.