@malnormalulo @cheetah_spottycat we tend to use it as a permanent and unalterable defining feature rather than a result of some action. A person who goes to school is a student, until they leave school, someone is a swimmer until they leave the water. Why should committing a criminal act leave a permanent mark?
If that is the case, aren't we all "criminals" ? Have any of us never parked illegally? Cut across a vacant lot? Briefly crossed a double yellow? Worn white after labor day?
@SkipHuffman @malnormalulo @cheetah_spottycat
“they’re not sending their best. […] They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.”
^ a quote from someone who doesn't have a lot of self awareness, it seems
@malnormalulo @cheetah_spottycat i would say that the reason why so many people think of "criminals" this way is because we as a society still treat "crime" as an individual moral failing, and anyone who commits one must therefore be some degree of evil, which in turn makes it easy to dehumanize them
this kind of thinking becomes much harder to justify if we would instead think of crime as a symptom of underlying socioeconomic problems (and which cannot be solved by throwing people into prison)
@cheetah_spottycat Same as bodily autonomy. If one person doesn't have it, none of us have it.
It's a courtesy we extend to corpses... but in some places in the world, not a right we extend to women.
If you want to see rights, have money.
Its the basic rule, everything else is distraction.
81% of Ontario prisoners have not been found guilty of a goddamned thing.
I always wondered why American prisoners do not have the right to vote since punishment by imprisonment is supposed to be loss of liberty, not loss of citizenship. Loss of rights for convicted criminals is just one step before loss of the right of due process for the accused.