@rrb @Pistolenkind @Jumpmed @RickiTarr
I don't know how often I pointed it out to idiots (or were they actually agents provocateurs?), it's either Trump (“the Israeli should do it properly this time”) or Harris (Trying to calm down the situation) in the US electoral system.
Sorry, for the Palestinians both options are bad, but one is clearly supporting their genocide, and it's not the Harris.
@Pistolenkind @rrb @Jumpmed @RickiTarr
On that note add SOME Latinos. I'll go ahead and say it CUBANS overwhelmingly helped to elect Trump. Data showed citizens with Mexican, PR, or Central American ties voted Harris.
https://newrepublic.com/post/188203/latino-vote-trump-harris-2024-election-data-breakdown
@Pistolenkind @rrb @Jumpmed @RickiTarr That's 100% true, but it is also true about all of the generalized categories we put people in including white men and white women.
When 75% of a category acts in a particular way, it seems hard for people to recognize the other 25% (which when the category contains millions, is still a large number of people).
What it means is that if you encounter a random someone in that category, there's a 75% chance they're one of the people acting in that particular way. But you should still treat them as an individual and find out which they are.
1/
@Pistolenkind @rrb @Jumpmed @RickiTarr
We lump too many people together and give them a single motivation 😞
Statistically that may work, and it may help political messaging, but I hope we can do better in conversations here.
Getting off my soapbox now.
/2
@mlippert
You're not wrong my dude. It bothers me as well, and it seems something increasingly used also by progressives and the left, whereas in former times it was a mostly right wing thing. Or maybe I was living in a bubble.