What the @WSJ investigation inexplicably leaves out—while confirming Elon Musk is an unregistered foreign agent of Russia and in violation of the Logan Act—is that Musk purchased Twitter with financing from the children of sanctioned Russian oligarchs. Why wasn't this mentioned? https://p.dw.com/p/4k5FG
What X's alleged ties to Russian oligarchs mean for Musk

A US court filing has forced X owner Elon Musk to reveal the identities of the social media platform's investors. The move could have far-reaching repercussions.

Deutsche Welle
@WSJ Here's a gift article of the Wall Street Journal investigation, which also confirms that Musk helped Russia kill civilians in Ukraine and privatizing government, like NASA's dependence on SpaceX, will always backfire and needs to stop https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/musk-putin-secret-conversations-37e1c187?st=QSfDLt&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
@AndreaChalupa @WSJ Very surprised that the #WSJ, a #Murdoch rag, would be anti-#Musk.
@SonofaGeorge @WSJ They've always had a handful of excellent reporters. It's their Editorial Page that's a fascist rag for the most part. Jesse Eisinger, the investigative reporter at ProPublica leading their investigations of the Supreme Court, wrote for the WSJ, as one of many examples. Yaroslav Trofimov is very good https://www.wsj.com/news/author/yaroslav-trofimov
@AndreaChalupa @WSJ
Doesn't seem to matter, just like all of the tRUMP crimes since we don't seem to have a gov't police or checks and balance anymore.
@AndreaChalupa @WSJ does it mean nothing, i feel like it means nothing and musky boi will just keep doing whatever the fuck he wants.
@citrus @WSJ Most likely, for now! Joseph McCarthy, Bernie Madoff, Jeffrey Epstein once seemed unstoppable, too
@AndreaChalupa @WSJ Don't forget that the princes also kicked in money.