We need to be ready to march in the streets if SCOTUS tries to pull some fuckery. They’re not even supposed to be in the loop on elections. That’s the newly elected Congress’ job.

Hate to break it to ya, but marching in the streets won’t solve this. More drastic measures would have to take place, and frankly I don’t see that happening.

On the contrary a massive number of people on the streets is the only way we’ve seen effective change in the past couple decades. Violence has led to protracted conflicts with a low rate of success.

Examples, please

They don’t have any, they just know you’re supposed to say “take to the streets.”

Well, there’s this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euromaidan#Overview

If you follow the thread here, this is in a US context, and it’s about “non violent” protests. Euromaidan activists seized the government quarter by force and stormed Yanukovych’s mansion.

While I take your point, this isn’t a particularly illustrative example in this context.

No this is exactly what it looks like. They filled the streets and they didn’t go into his mansion until he fled after the Army turned on him for using lethal force against the crowd.

Just like the water hoses and dogs picture was very resonant in the US. The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

Yes, as I mentioned, 60 years ago.