Here’s a link to a comment I left on their linkedin post in case anyone is invested
Our video from last summer is making the rounds again 🌳 And we get why — heatwave season is just around the corner. As far as solutions go, urban trees are… | 31 comments on LinkedIn
some AI boosters claim that AI doesn't actually use a lot of fresh water. this is lies and bullshit. AI training and serving uses a fucking ton of water for data centre cooling that then isn't available for other uses. here's some details with numbers https://web.archive.org/web/20230912035430/https://www.kcci.com/article/ai-technology-behind-chatgpt-built-in-west-des-moines-iowa-microsoft/45081445 yes there will be a Pivot to AI on this, gathering more number-bearing sources
I'm sharing this here because I feel like an old man shaking his fist at a cloud over there https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stevefarrugia_can-you-guess-how-many-trees-your-entire-activity-7266402586960826368-V9iF
And because Ecosia just won a German Sustainability award for 2024
Ecosia has a chatgpt integration which they call a "green feature" because they prompt guide it to give "sustainable answers" - meanwhile there is mounting…
Ecosia vs Google: Search the Web, or Feed the Kraken? Every time you search the web, you're casting a vote. Not just for what you're looking for—but for the world you want to live in. Google built its empire on the promise to "do no evil." But today, it’s the blueprint for techno-feudalism. A trillion-dollar juggernaut that hoards user data, dominates digital ad markets, enables surveillance capitalism, and shapes what billions see—and don’t see—online. Behind the clean homepage lies a labyrinth of contradictions: - Carbon Pledges vs. Massive Emissions: Google claims carbon neutrality, yet powers data centers with fossil fuels and bankrolls climate denial think tanks. - Privacy Claims vs. Surveillance Reality: It tracks you across apps, devices, and the physical world—turning your life into behavioral data for sale. - Democracy vs. Monopoly: It throttles competitors, manipulates algorithms, and plays gatekeeper to the internet itself. Meanwhile, Ecosia quietly offers an antidote. - Ecosia is not-for-profit: 100% of profits go to climate action. Over 200 million trees planted—turning searches into reforestation efforts worldwide. - Privacy-first: No personal data sold. No third-party trackers. Your search is yours. - Green Infrastructure: Powered by 300% renewable energy—meaning every search removes CO₂ from the air. - Purpose is protected through legal structures. No greedy billionaire can snap it up to maximise ROA. Ecosia isn’t perfect. But it’s proof that another internet is possible—one rooted in regeneration, not extraction. So ask yourself: Are you feeding a kraken that consumes democracy, data, and the planet? Or are you planting forests with your searches? It’s not just what you search. It’s who you are and what you stand for. #Leadership #transformation #sustainability
Don’t ask us about our openai integration
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ecosia_climatewins-climatenews-activity-7250407285934440448-RG8U
Does the openai subscription fall under “other climate impact”?
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ecosia_transparency-activity-7251864656875573248-24mS
Add this to the pile, Ecosia
I guess I’m not getting bored of this, ecosia
p.s. ecosia still has an ai chat that is chatgpt and they call the responses "green answers"
@fasterandworse “Unfortunately the more important issue is that leading language AI model providers are still not transparent about the energy consumption of their models, …” yeah … so …why did they implement an AI chat anyway? As “the greenest browser”? Are they playing a guessing game?
I assume none of their users asked for that kind of feature. If you can not confidently implement an AI chat that does not harm the climate in any way, you simply do not implement it.
@fasterandworse nevermind that was my regional settings. why dont they just show a big "HEY, NO RUSSIANS HERE"? why do they even try to pretend they are good, shoving an AI into their own website?
anyway, i changed the region to en_us, and it yielded no results
what. a. shame.

@fasterandworse It does look a bit in poor taste. Their idea of "business as usual to save the world" is prone to scams and cover-ups. But at least they have a pretty clear reporting system that should make it easy for any investigative journalist to have come up with something if they're not honest:
https://blog.ecosia.org/ecosia-financial-reports-tree-planting-receipts/
@benjaoming @fasterandworse aren't most of these companies that compensate carbon emissions scams anyway? Like, they do plant some trees but these are either not long term forest or the numbers of how much co2 a tree captures get massively inflated by doing some dodgy math
idk how you would check this tho
@koolkat @benjaoming @fasterandworse yeah i was wondering if and how a layperson like me could vet whether or not a project is part of the 2% that actually compensate as much carbon as they claim
for now i'll just assume all of them are scams
@powersource @benjaoming @fasterandworse They do have some tree planting projects in the global north.
For example:
160 in France
2222 in the UK
33,761 in Canada
84,091 in the USA
See for reference:
https://blog.ecosia.org/tag/where-does-ecosia-plant-trees/
@fasterandworse i'm not really the right kind of nerd to figure out the exact numbers, but i've suspected the use of water evaporative cooling in the datacenters themselves is a feature designed to use less electricity on heat pumping ... at the expense of using more purified water, which someone else must produce.
i wonder if anyone's done any investigation or running (electricity/carbon) numbers along these lines?