Nintendo filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair, Inc.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/25392677

Nintendo filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair, Inc. - sh.itjust.works

Patents Assigned to THE POKEMON COMPANY - Justia Patents Search

Justia - Patents - Patents and Patent Application Resources

Half of those patents read like if they use vague enough language to justify patenting how computers work.
Welcome to Software Patents 101.
These can’t be real, they read like they were generated by an AI prompt.
No, that’s the pal-world-monster arts.
Palworld monsters are not AI generated. The artist would very much lile to stop being compared to an AI.

Well, it makes me think that AI training was probably biased towards legal drivel like this, since it’s public facing, professional and probably even translated in multiple languages.

The student got so good that people think the teacher is imitating it.

Those are just abstract if I’m not mistaken. There should be more detailed specifications.
My guess is the “Pokemon Box Storage” system since palworld stores pals in a palbox.
US Patent for Content data holding system, storage medium, content data holding server, and data management method Patent (Patent # 11,998,838 issued June 4, 2024) - Justia Patents Search

A server includes a content storage medium configured to store content data of content usable in different types of games up to a first upper number, and a management information storage medium configured to store valid period information of a right to use an extended function concerning the content data The server, in case that a right to use an extended function is valid, sends the content data to an information-processing device or receives the content data from the information-processing device, and stores the content data in the content storage medium up to a second upper number larger than the first upper number. The server, in case that the right is invalid, performs at least one of transmission of the content data to the information-processing device and reception of the content data from the information-processing device, in a restricted manner as compared with a case where the right is valid.

Is that the wrong link? This seems totally unrelated to Pokemon in boxes, and is more about multi console character storage systems.
In the “other references” they link to the bulbapedia article for Pokemon box so I figured thats what the whole thing was about, but yeah it does read like accessing data on a server

Nintendo patents video game inventory system.

Not the onion.

(Not a patent lawyer, and I’m sure it’s more complicated than that, but come on)

How can they let companies file such broad, vague patents for mechanics that have existed since forever? For example, 20240286040, is just what flying mounts have done in WoW since 2007 or even the flying cap in Mario 64 ffs. There are probably other earlier examples, but it goes to show that it’s just noise to monopolize innovation and scare other devs.
US Patent Application for NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN GAME PROGRAM, GAME SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD Patent Application (Application #20240286040 issued August 29, 2024) - Justia Patents Search

In an example of a game program, a ground boarding target object or an air boarding target object is selected by a selection operation, and a player character is caused to board the selected boarding target object. If the player character aboard the air boarding target object moves toward the ground, the player character is automatically changed to the state where the player character is aboard the ground boarding target object, and brought into the state where the player character can move on the ground.

Long story short, the claims get much longer and restrictive through the application process. The example you asked about is currently undergoing a non-final rejection, and the claims will get much more restrictive in further iterations (assuming that the application has actual merit somewhere in the original dependent claims)

You can check the application history here: Global Dossier

Since this was filed in Japan, it would have to be parents Nintendo own in Japan that are infringed and those don’t necessarily perfectly match those in the US

I’m sorry who in their right mind signed off on this patent

NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN GAME PROGRAM, GAME SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD

Thats literally any online game server

I think that’s setting the context for the claims they make, not a claim in itself.