The push for an "age verification" requirement on the Internet is 1% aimed at protecting children and 99% aimed at controlling speech. It effectively bans anonymity, for starters.

It is a license to speak, and read.

https://edri.org/our-work/open-letter-the-dangers-of-age-verification-proposals-to-fundamental-rights-online/

Open letter: The dangers of age verification proposals to fundamental rights online - European Digital Rights (EDRi)

On 16 September, EDRi and 63 organisations, academics and experts in privacy, encryption, child safety, sex workers' rights and consumer rights issued a joint statement urging the European Commission to prioritise effective child safety measures while expressing serious concerns about the suitability, proportionality, and negative impact on fundamental rights of current age verification proposals.

European Digital Rights (EDRi)

@dangillmor

If this sort of legislation isn't suitable, what do you think would be the best way to protect children online?

@gsymon @dangillmor
Their parents?

@wolnyjez @dangillmor

Well, wouldn't it be great if parents always got it right. Some Catholics would be feeling a lot better about life.

@gsymon @dangillmor
They are not always right, but a few parents who are not coping is no reason to give the state such a powerful tool.

(A tool that will be extended to other types of websites in the future, I have no doubt about that)