@ChrisMayLA6
I made a slightly different point in another conversation yesterday. If you look at international comparisons - some in graphical form here: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/blogs/comparing-nhs-to-health-care-systems-other-countries - what you find is that the NHS is still comparatively efficient in cost-benefit terms, but very obviously lacks investment in equipment and staff.
The government's emphasis on efficiency, on reform before investment, and especially on using private healthcare providers (which work by attracting away NHS staff) therefore seem to me precisely the wrong prioritisation - indeed the opposite of what is really needed, which is more staff and equipment for the NHS.
Moreover, I suspect the same is true on the prevention side too. Health problems arising from poor housing, diet, stretched social services, etc, all need investment - which in many cases would pay for itself - recent research into, for example, universal free school meals, showed how - https://urbanhealth.org.uk/insights/reports/expanding-free-school-meals-a-cost-benefit-analysis