Professional at work

@stux you see a “professional at work”, I see a 5-person team losing a day’s work to 1 person and a machine

(I’m joking. But I genuinely find it interesting and funny how attitudes towards this kinda thing change over time)

@witewulf @stux
Funny joke.
But I see 1 person who can do more than 5 people. And the other 4 also have this skill, making human progress go even faster, increasing the quality of life for us all.
@Sector9 @witewulf @stux I see one person who (like everyone) should have a 5 hour work week, because we have the capability not to need everybody working 40-60 hours a week doing bullshit. We don't have to make up more stuff to do. Just meet our needs more efficiently, mostly with machines, then fucking STOP.
@dalias @Sector9 @stux that’s an interesting counterpoint to the arguments against LLMs and the like doing peoples’ work
@witewulf @Sector9 @stux It's not a counterpoint to that. LLMs don't do people's work. They magnify the bullshit level of bullshit jobs that aren't actual work, but primarily, help techbros commit securities fraud.

@dalias @Sector9 @stux so you'd be happy if 80% (I'm assuming a 40hr work week) of your work (and pay) was taken away because a machine (regardless of it's perceived ability) was doing it?

Or are you saying that 80% of the work you do is pointless and you shouldn’t be doing it (and being paid for it) in the first place?

@witewulf @dalias @Sector9 @stux wages could be increased to allow people to work reduced time and still make a living wage. In theory this is what technological advances should be doing whenever they improve productivity. In practice historically improvements in automation increase or hold steady working hours because its viewed as a way to double profits instead of reducing work hours.