Don't do it. Just don't. 😅
I skip Handbrake and the library as a middleman altogether.
@VulcanTourist @cy @CyberpunkLibrarian
Yes, but then the library doesn't get the funding it needs to support your neighbours who don't have other access!
@deirdrebeth @cy @CyberpunkLibrarian
I'd teach the neighbors that other access if they asked... but they'd rather treat us like crap than equals. They aren't patrons of the library, either, so....
@cy @deirdrebeth @CyberpunkLibrarian
I could try. The most important component is a trustworthy reliable lips-are-sealed VPN. I previously used a blocklist with some success, but when it stopped being aggressively maintained it was time to move on... so now I pay money for a VPN subscription.
The other components in my "workflow" are Flaresolverr, Prowlarr, Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent, and Jellyfin... oh, and a big fat 10-bay NAS. The latter was quite the expense, but a worthy investment.
A VPN is quite distinct from an ISP. If I can afford one on a quite limited fixed income, I suspect that quite a few others can as well. I pay many times more - a ridiculous sum by the estimate of people elsewhere in the world - for service from our ISP than I do for the VPN service. The one I use can be readily recommended.
I'd like to share our NAS as you mention - just another CAT 6e cable - but again they'd have to be comparably decent people (they're not) to make it happen.
@CyberpunkLibrarian Not only does my library have a streaming service (Kanopy), but you don't even have to live there to get a library card. Most libraries will give out cards for a yearly fee.
The hardest thing to get used to is: when I push "Play", the movie starts. When it's over, I'm back at the main screen again. It's like being able to watch a movie, without having ads shoved in your face.
(Not sure if they are selling your data, though. Maybe someone here can tell me.)
Personally I prefer Jellyfin to Plex.
@nosaj BIG SAME.
All the good things of Plex, none of the bad, and I don't have to pay to access content on my own server!
bad@CyberpunkLibrarian
Every day is Christmas at the library and librarians are a combination of Santa Claus and Sherlock Holmes.
I keep on putting it out there because it's true and more people need to realize.
PS: Libraries are an example of socialism - benefit for the public rather than private interests.

@lilianalytic HERE IS A LIST OF SITES THAT YOU SHOULD NOT VISIT!
Because that would be illegal. You wouldn't wanna do that, would you? So take this list and make sure you never trip on a shoe and fall over your keyboard and accidentally type one of these URLs into the browser!
@CyberpunkLibrarian "Please don't take a copy of it" ... because it's literally right there, and checking it out again improves the accuracy of the "stuff people check out" statistics!
edit: I think the word I was looking for was "circulation".
@CyberpunkLibrarian @cykonot You should not use tools such as Handbrake. Those tools claim that they can make copies of physical media, and they do that, quite well actually.
Anyway, as I was saying.
@CyberpunkLibrarian I have two questions:
we have streaming services toohow does that work? like free Netflix accounts? do the library computers have a Netflix subscription? or do they run their own streaming services, like with Jellyfin or similar, based on the media they own?I guess it's illegalis it even illegal? I was under the impression that this is genuinely legal in many jurisdictions, as long as you don't distribute your own digital copy further.I was under the impression that this is genuinely legal in many jurisdictions
So, the way this works to my understanding is that many jurisdictions allow the right to create a personal backup copy of any media you own. This has caveats:
@sodiboo @CyberpunkLibrarian basically, yeah. The bit about "any amount of personal copies" can theoretically differ by jurisdiction (some try to limit it, iirc), but obviously that's both difficult to enforce and absurd (imo).
which also makes downloading pirated content legal
this part's actually interesting; iirc, prevailing legal opinion holds that the copy should be made of the media you own, and thus downloading pirated content is always illegal. Some justifications could include if the pirated copy is at all different (censorship changes, or perhaps including bonus content) versus the copy you own. For backup copies, of course, as long as the content is, in fact, identical, it could be logically rather difficult to prove (and in general it's not usually worth going after pirate consumers, since yeah, it's a lot easier to prosecute - and damages can be more easily assessed against - distributors).
Admittedly, whilst I seem to recall this opinion being asserted for the UK specifically (for example), the Gov't's own advice from 2014 doesn't make any mention of the consumer side (though advice is subordinate to legislation, ofc):
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/359247/Exceptions_to_copyright_-_Guidance_for_consumers.pdf
In answer to the other half, they have their own streaming service(s) that isn't in direct competition to any of the others and instead gets licences direct from the publishers.
I don't know if all libraries use the same but mine uses Hoopla.
@jessamyn @CyberpunkLibrarian Sadly, if I proposed that to my system, the IT department would think it was cool, but mostly laugh at my proposal for something new while they barely have enough people to keep everything from spontaneously combusting.
I suspect this is true in most public library spaces, unfortunately.
Someone needs to crack ebooks, what publishers are doing to libraries, and thus society, is just wrong.
@Frances_Larina
On one hand, I get why the main drm stripper in calibre strictly does not work on Ovwrdrive-mqndated library drm, but c'mon.
*is a librarian and rips a shitlold of cds every year.*
I'm so curious: Why don't libraries carry more self-published, creative commons and public domain books?
@Frances_Larina
Largely because of Overdrive's monopoly. They don't carry them and they have 05% markets here, so it doesn't happen. Palace(?) Books is trying to compete, but it's a very steep uphill battle.
Also, a lot of self published stiff nowadays is by Amazon, and they'd rather see libraries gone in spite of the fact it's been proven we increase book sales.
What I'd love to see is independent publishers make a consortium for library lending. I know a lot don't use drm, so as library lending is one of the few valid uses of it imo, that can also be a hinderance.