I wish I had the equivalent of threads for my own blog... there's something uniquely interesting about a publishing medium that produces a chronological record of the way you explored a specific thought

A thread is almost like a mini-blog for evolving one very specific idea over time

The biggest design challenge is deciding what to do with threads that might have new notes added to them for months or even years - how does that play into a most-recent-posts on the homepage and at top of RSS feed blogging platform?
@simon they only exist in the context of what came before them now feels like a pretty good Design Principle

@danhon @simon This also feels like a cross referencing & section challenge that all news orgs face.

Like take a look at what the Verge does with the side rail: https://www.theverge.com/

The Verge

The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.

The Verge
@simon Separate blog posts in the feeds, add a "thread" field fk to point to the first post, first post renders them all in chronological order, URL is /original/#new.
@radiac @simon This is what I was thinking. Anchors seems like a simple answer to link to latest which keeping the context.
@simon Wikipedia Talk pages typically are marked up into threads; the atom feed simply carries timestamped diffs of edits. Overall not really pleasent but the page could be endless I guess (or old content archived into sub pages and edited back etc.)
@simon
1. when adding a note to a thread have a checkbox (default:off) to indicate if it is a note worth adding to the main rss feed
2. When a note from a thread is added to the rss feed it also includes a little automatically generated info about the context.
(I’ve done similar on a few wiki like systems)