We live in a day where a healthy diet can be fully synthesized, even for a human. I think the claim that a cat cannot flourish under one requires strict scrutiny and proper links to scientific articles demonstrating this finding.

edit: Because we do have evidence indicating such a diet is not harmful, so evidence that disputes this would need to exist.

www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/1/52

edit2: Another thing that occured to me that may help shed light on this: Humans have to eat food in order to survive, yes?

No, actually. We can hook you up to an IV and keep you alive for as long as we need by pumping the necessary nutrients directly into your bloodstream, bypassing your digestive tract altogether. We call this intravenous feeding.

If some other instance wants to scoop up the animal abuse demographic now that they are ejected from .world, I think we will all survive

Veganism is a philosophy and way of living that excludes all forms of animal exploitation and promotes animal-free alternatives.

That is misrepresenting the situations as vegans are the ones reducing animal abuse by not buying animals products and for holding those who do accountable.

Meat is not required for pets as there is enough studies to suggest this conclusion.

Bold claims require bold evidence. Natural meat eaters should naturally eat meat. To say otherwise requires a loooot of evidence.

Cats are obligate carnivores. If they don’t eat meat, they will get sick and die. This doesn’t apply to dogs.

Veganism is valid, but it does conflict with some pet ownership.

Experiment on yourself all you want, but not your companion who depends on you. This is not a great subject to gather support from a larger audience with.

That being said, controversial subjects need to be discussed, not deleted. Nobody was intentionally trying to harm animals here. These actions don’t feel right

I don’t care what community we’re talking about, we’re discussing powermod/poweradmin here so i do care about the action of the mod and if you think just because you’re vegan you get to be exempted by common sense, then you’re mistaken. People are talking about food for pets, not for human consumption, it’s still a hot topic that you yourself said it’s less studied and can’t even be sure if it’s safe to do so, discussion amongst the community are needed, not swept under the rug. You guys are getting criticised here not because of being vegan, but because of the action you guys take, stop using veganism as your shield and looking like a bunch of imbecile.

People said veganism isn’t a religion but this looks more and more like one.