Shaming an asshole for dressing as a woman is still shaming someone for dressing g as a woman. Regardless of how you justify it.

Point of hypocrisy makes the critics hypocrites? Wow then Trump and Vance can’t be criticized for their hypocrisies. That’s mighty convenient for them…

I didn’t say they can’t be criticized, did I? I simply said that making fun of someone for dressing as a woman is belittling those that dress as women right along side him.

Explain the difference to them- not me.

Sigh, yes you did. At least that’s how your statement will be read. It is not anti drag to point out George Santos and JD Vance are hypocritical for calling drag artists pedophiles while engaging in the same behavior. Our ridicule of a cruel person is not the same as their hate for a disenfranchised group.

If it takes you rewriting my words to mean something other than what I directly said-

Your point is irrelevant.

Making fun of him for cross dressing is making fun of cross dressers. It’s no different. No matter how you explain it.

You’re wrong, sunroc is right.

So… cross dressing is shameful only if you hate the person….

Lemmy is fucking weird.

No one said cross dressing is shameful, being a hypocritical cunt is the shameful part. And defending hypocritical cunts while pretending to care about cross dressing and transgender is even more shameful.