RapidcreekSecond Photo Alleged to Show JD Vance in Drag Posted Online
More fabulous shot, I think
The eyeliner seems to always have worked on his face. I can see why he stuck with the more minimal makeup for regular events
Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Daily Beast:
> MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source
mad_asshatterSofa Loren’s daughter, Anita Cushion
EncephalotrocityI’ve been like “Who the fuck cares about him cross-dressing?” MAGA will write it off as cosplay/a joke, and I have a hard time thinking any undecideds would be convinced to vote for/against him just for a couple of photos. Then I saw this comment and it all made sense o7 😅
Jo MiranHave some Lemmy Gold.
It puts the lotion on its skin
MyOpinionJD living his best life. These self haters always coming for everyone else.
The guy who’s changed his name 6 times, and no longer goes by a ‘name’, rather it’s a nick, rails against pronouns and choice and preference and self.
This must have been earlier at the party, the other photo looks heavier on the five-O-clock shadow, or is it the lighting?
Touched it up during the eyeliner refresh.
Or pre-coitcouchal.
A second JD Vance drag photo has hit the internet.
ripcordWhere is it?
Link is dead. Brings up their 404 page.
Not OP, but the link still works for me. Here’s an archived version of the story
Not sure what was going on earlier but it works now.
The most offensive part of it is how crappy he looks. Get out of my face with that Party City wig.
JD Vance actually looks kinda hot and fabulous in drag tbh, way better than in his Trumpian getup.
His Avril Lavigne eyeliner just started making way more sense.
StarshotJohnBetter than Rudy in drag??
TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)I’m jealous, I hit my eye about 99% of the time. This motherfucker comes out and his eyes look stunning.
RustywhimsCan the VP debate be a RuPaul lip sync for for life challenge instead? I feel like Walz would still kill it
【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】These photos don’t bother me at all but then I’m not a weird piece of shit.
The photos aren’t the problem. It’s the hypocrisy.
Exactly. Trump and Vance cannot condemn drag shows as “over-sexualized grooming behavior” without first explaining how it’s ok for Vance to cross-dress and for Trump to motorboat drag queen Rudy Giuliani. You can’t have it both ways guys.
I’m bothered that he did so poorly with the wig, but hey, how much can you spend on a good wig on a college student’s budget
kescusayI won’t go after anyone for dressing however they want. Obsessing over someone else’s choice of clothing is weird.
I will, however, go after fucking hypocrites for their hypocrisy. And JD… you’re a fucking hypocritical piece of shit.
Was going to post something similar. The messaging should not be any issues with the cross dressing but only the hypocrisy! I fucking loathe hypocrites. Have some integrity ffs.
You don’t actually believe it do you? I thought it was obvious that these are memes like the couch thing.
Normally, I’d assume it was like the couch thing, but the Trump campaign has very specifically not denied that the photos are real. Since that denial would be incredibly easy if the photos couldn’t be verified, it’s looking more and more like they’re legit.
Yeah but also if they take time to deny or explain everything, then they come across as defensive and weak. The reality is that in a popularity contest, rumors are effective if you aren’t above them. I think Trump team’s best strategy would be to ignore the salacious news/rumors for a while, then make a dismissive response about the opposition making things up because they are nasty and small minded people. I’m sure that’s what they are doing, but it will be interesting to see. Trump needs to reassert himself as the cool kid somehow and responding and reacting won’t do it.
What would they need to take time to do? If the photos were AI fakes, it would take about ten seconds to prove it. Then you laugh them off dismissively and move on. This “no comment” stuff is precisely why the photos are gaining credibility.
Yeah maybe, but every second you spend defending or deflecting that kind of thing is a win for blue team. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. If you are reacting, you are losing. Tbh the pictures could be real too, in which case he definitely can’t talk about it because the opposition would eat him alive, even if the reality were pretty unremarkable.
If they’re real - and frankly, they do seem to be - eventually he’ll have to address it, because no-commenting every time they’re brought up will just make it look like he has something to hide.
They can’t be above this rumor because their position on drag and trans issues are beneath it.
Don’t actually believe what? That while he was a college lib, JD Vance participated in cross-dressing themed parties and had no problem with it? That his whole “LBGT IS SIN” schtick is a grift and/or brainworms?
Nah, I 100% believe both these pictures are him. Not that I give a fuck at all, if not for the abominable hypocrisy further convincing me that this weirdo isn’t to be trusted because he’s either lying for fortune and power, or he’s fucking broken and a death cult fundie who will do nothing but further sink this nation.
JD stand for Jorkin Depeanus btw
ThtevenHe really fell in love with that eye liner.
It was legit the first and only thing that came to mind when I first saw him and subsequently. Its not even like subtle
T h o s e w i t h t h e m o s t t o l o s e
S h o u t t h e l o u d e s t
The new photo quickly got more than 500,000 views with one user posting: “So this is what it’s like for August to have two Christmases in it.”
😂
solsangraaltwo Christmases…so far
Does he still use the same eyeliner?
MoogleMaestroHis rate of usage, he probably has a warehouse dedicated for storage.
And again, that’s no big deal if he wasn’t literally the world’s biggest hypocrite and pushing for policies that are bigoted.
This is the guy analyzing Tim Walz having enthusiastic hand waves
I swear to God, if this is what Iran is leaking in regards to the 271 page dossier on Vance
I can’t WAIT to see the other 269 pages
It’s not. Some dude on Twitter got it from some other dudes from Facebook.
What dossier are you referring to?
There’s a parallel universe where Vance just accepted who they were and had support from family and friends. Remember, be kind to questioning youths or they too may end up hypocritical chuds!
CadeillacMamaw was as kind as she knew how to be
“I’ll never forget the time I convinced myself that I was gay. I was eight or nine, maybe younger, and I stumbled upon a broadcast by some fire-and-brimstone preacher. The man spoke about the evils of homosexuals, how they had infiltrated our society, and how they were all destined for hell absent some serious repenting. At the time, the only thing I knew about gay men was that they preferred men to women. This described me perfectly: I disliked girls, and my best friend in the world was my buddy Bill. Oh no, I’m going to hell.”
When he brought up the issue with his grandmother — known to Vance as “Mamaw” — she replied bluntly: “Don’t be a fucking idiot, how would you know that you’re gay?”
When Vance explained his reasoning, she laughed.
“JD, do you want to suck dicks?” she said, according to the book.
The young Vance, apparently “flabbergasted,” said: “Of course not!”
“Then you’re not gay. And even if you did want to suck dicks, that would be okay,” she replied. “God would still love you.”
I was mostly joking but if it turns it a televangelist is what set all this in motion, I wouldn’t be terribly surprised. Thanks for the insight, there is a zero percent chance I read his book!
We see the origin story of Vance’s eyeliner.
They’re trying to make him look hot to counter all the bad Kamala memes that keep backfiring on the chuds
Hawk Tuah Girl only made it to VP for her strong head game. Good for her.
Shaming an asshole for dressing as a woman is still shaming someone for dressing g as a woman. Regardless of how you justify it.
Point of hypocrisy makes the critics hypocrites? Wow then Trump and Vance can’t be criticized for their hypocrisies. That’s mighty convenient for them…
I didn’t say they can’t be criticized, did I? I simply said that making fun of someone for dressing as a woman is belittling those that dress as women right along side him.
Explain the difference to them- not me.
Sigh, yes you did. At least that’s how your statement will be read. It is not anti drag to point out George Santos and JD Vance are hypocritical for calling drag artists pedophiles while engaging in the same behavior. Our ridicule of a cruel person is not the same as their hate for a disenfranchised group.