@stroughtonsmith But also, creators who use Patreon often have dedicated and highly loyal audiences. Pissing off these creators by taking 30% of their income means it will absolutely be spoken about in the bad light it deserves to their patreons.
This is one of most efficient routes to highly effective and personalised bad marketing I can imagine
Who better to make money off than those you have no business relationship with?
Corporations have a twisted view of the world, by law. Until citizens push their governments to pass laws that ballance a company's fiduciary responsibility to shareholders against public responsibility/interests, this is the way.
(Of course, the biggest problem will be defining that, right? 🤔)
Sure, you could motivate Apple users, but since they tend to be (institutionalized/indoctrinated/locked-in/fanatic) about the brand... Not sure Apple can do wrong in their eyes: so the duty to shareholders to 'keep customers happy' likely won't have any effect.)
Something I haven't heard much about is that Patreon, being a multi-sided marketplace, has a more complex/diverse creator-monetization model that wouldn't fully translate to Apple IAP.
2 noteworthy examples are: Per Creation Payments and Milestone Goals.
In this video Patreon's CEO explains it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-LoTH3PzgM
Apple is requiring that Patreon switch to their iOS in-app purchase system starting this November, or risk being removed from the App Store. Apple's requirem...
@danielinoa @stroughtonsmith
HAD
They are giving these up so they can keep their iOS app.