Martin Rundkvist
Jote 🏳️🌈 
@mrundkvist Well to be fair, I read a lot of shit, and read really fast. But there is a lot of situations where I prefer to listen to stuff, while doing other stuff. (I'm millennial). And sometimes I listen to videos with a dude talking about an article or a podcast about it (or several) to get different perspectives on the topic etc.
@ailnoth I listen to lots of #podcasts. I use YouTube for two purposes only: to explain #boardgames rules and the Double Windsor Tie Knot. TikTok is for children.
@mrundkvist I mean if you are on kids tiktok then yes it is for children, in my carefully curated feed we have discussion about political, HBTQIA+ issues, kink things, archeology, space and science.
Joracle@ailnoth @mrundkvist a 20 second discussion isn't really a discussion.
@joracle Yes, but also Tiktok videos can be 10 minutes now, and they have some weird rollout with up to 60 minutes, but videos in general. @mrundkvist
@ailnoth @mrundkvist and youtube allows videos to be several hours long, this doesn't mean that people will either make or watch them.
kravietz 🦇Debate over an article etc, all you said makes perfect sense. I think the guy is being frustrated about people who provide TikTok videos because it’s also the only source they used, inheriting all the video’s unavoidable simplifications.
There’s another aspect to it - when given a link to an article, it takes me maybe 30 seconds to scan and initially assess its quality (scientific vs popular, sources, references, consistency). When given a 15-60 min long video on YT you are forced to sample it sequentially to see what they’re talking about, and in most cases it’s waste of time.
@kravietz Yes, I agree. But there is another aspect at play here, I just like to yank the chain of @mrundkvist whenever I have the chance to do it. ;)