It's just after 5am, I've been signed in to the (empty) Zoom room for 15 min (as I was directed) but nobody is here yet to test my presentation, and I can't hear the sound in the room (but I *can* hear annoying hold music). And I heard that in the previous session all the remote speakers had no sound. So...I'm not real confident this is going to work...

Why are hybrid meetings so hard to implement?

Yana Yakushina ran a big analysis of individual countries' rules around dark skies, quiet skies, and reduction of impacts to astronomy.

She didn't say this outright, but my takeaway is that astronomy IS space exploration and thus should be protected by the Outer Space Treaty. But some countries have pushed astronomy to the sidelines.

She says the primary area for national-level legislation that is effective is environmental law and space law, and sometimes protection of cultural heritage

Valdivia Lefort: general recommendations on how to get dark and quiet skies protections to happen at the national level. Notes that countries that DO have protections already usually focus on terrestrial light pollution only, with no provision for satellite light pollution.

Focusing on talking about the environmental impact of satellites is going to be most powerful. (Just referenced a paper I'm a co-author on, yay)

Tamara Blagojevic: starts with a reminder that very small actions and words can make a big difference. Social norms eventually become legal norms. Gave some environmental law examples for different countries

(side note: this is all super interesting...I thought the best way forward to was to wait for international rules on satellites, but these policy talks seem to be 100% focused on individual countries. Hm, will have to digest this for a bit...)

Carolyn Crichton: "I may step away from the mic but you should still be able to hear me because I'm very loud and American" haha

Switzerland has good dark and quiet skies rules, why? Part of SKA, and also have companies building megaconstellations. EPFL(?) Space Sustainability Hub - looking at satellite streaks in large datasets, looking at satellite atmospheric pollution

Lightning talks

John Barentine: look back to Project West Ford: US military launched millions of tiny metal shards into upper atmosphere, astronomers were PISSED and fought back effectively with very strong statements from IAU (contrast that with today when IAU "doesn't want to be political")

Giorgio Siringo: spectrum management at ALMA. Notes that right now there is no radio interference from satellites at ALMA frequencies, but that could change anytime since sat companies have already gotten licenses to use ALMA frequencies.

Pedro Sanhueza: why aren't we talking more about environmental impacts of satellites? Why aren't countries enforcing env. regulations?? This is SO important.

Ok my talk is done. I started by saying that my goal was to make everyone in the audience angry, and then tell them some actions they can take. I pointed out how it's astronomers who do ALL the public education for SpaceX, because SpaceX doesn't respond to journalist questions ever. UFO sightings/Starlink trains? Reentries/weird rocket plumes? Space junk? Astronomers are answering everyone's questions.

Here's my slides with my wish list for sat companies and actions for individuals: