CrowdStrike’s billion-dollar outage is a wake-up call. We need antitrust action now to prevent future tech collapses. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/07/crowdstrike-antitrust-and-digital-monoculture
CrowdStrike, Antitrust, and the Digital Monoculture

Last month’s unprecedented global IT failure should be a wakeup call. Decades of antitrust inaction have made many industries dangerously reliant on the same tools, making such crises inevitable. We must demand regulators break up the digital monocultures that are creating a less competitive, less...

Electronic Frontier Foundation

@eff

Not taking sides here, but if a company has the BEST cybersecurity on the planet available, should they not have a "monopoly" position?

That's a challenge here, innovation on excellent cybersecurity can't be subject to market requirements that other people be allowed to compete.

Your product either works or it doesn't. In CrowdStrike's case, it worked a little bit too well but also because not enough people tested before they deployed it.

@Ehay2k @eff Breaking monopolies isnt just about fairness. Its about allowing the existense of better innovations that might not happen at just a single company.
@ZenXArch @eff
I agree that generally speaking monopolies are not good for the consumer. However, if you have a quasi-monopoly because your product is so much better than anyone else's, then that's actually the free market at work. What you shouldn't be allowed to do, and what companies are often punished for, is using your market position as leverage to further your monopoly.
In this case, CrowdStrike doesn't have a monopoly, far from it. It's a very crowded space with lots of competition.