I wonder if we can ever get over the innate tension—often disintegrating into outright conflict—between those two powerful uses of language: knowledge transfer and persuasion. The first is regularly absud, if not outright sacrificed, to the latter.
Will we ever find a way to protect knowledge, in language, for the general public? Since it seems infeasible for everyone to learn a formal legal/scientific dialect.
@brianklaas democracy is when democrats and republic is when republicans, what's so hard to understand? /s
Anyway, if the orange guy will win, then they might as well be correct.
@brianklaas It was quite long ago when I first encountered the "this is not a democracy, it's a republic" reasoning and I remember being in awe for a few minutes just thinking how could someone be that stupid. It stills amaze me btw.
Great piece man.
P.S. I dream with a world in which the word "billion" is correctly used ;)
They've always done crap like that for as long as I can remember. Redefining words and phrases is a favorite tactic on the right.
"“America is a republic, NOT a democracy”"
As you call it, the mic-drop magical qualities for the MAGA crowd I've never bothered to plumb
So thanks for that explainer
Then, one of my favorites:
"AR does *NOT* stand for assault rifle!!!"
which seems to trump some sort of argument some ammosexuals need to win
As a fun hint, I offer, from Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehukpdse8_w
[edit: don't know what's wrong with that link if it doesn't play but Youtube has become increasingly sucky...]