New preprint is out! We combine our recent open dataset of #APC prices with the publication counts per journal-year from @OpenAlex to estimate how much the academic community has paid in APCs over the last five years.

A: $8.349 billion ($8.968 billion in 2023 US dollars) spent on APCs.

$2.5B in 2023 alone.

We also find that median APCs *paid* are higher than median *listed* fees for both gold (paid: $2,450 vs listed: $2,000) and hybrid ($3,600 vs $3,230).

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551

Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023

This study presents estimates of the global expenditure on article processing charges (APCs) paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. APCs are fees charged for publishing in some fully open access journals (gold) and in subscription journals to make individual articles open access (hybrid). There is currently no way to systematically track institutional, national or global expenses for open access publishing due to a lack of transparency in APC prices, what articles they are paid for, or who pays them. We therefore curated and used an open dataset of annual APC list prices from Elsevier, Frontiers, MDPI, PLOS, Springer Nature, and Wiley in combination with the number of open access articles from these publishers indexed by OpenAlex to estimate that, globally, a total of \$8.349 billion (\$8.968 billion in 2023 US dollars) were spent on APCs between 2019 and 2023. We estimate that in 2023 MDPI (\$681.6 million), Elsevier (\$582.8 million) and Springer Nature (\$546.6) generated the most revenue with APCs. After adjusting for inflation, we also show that annual spending almost tripled from \$910.3 million in 2019 to \$2.538 billion in 2023, that hybrid exceed gold fees, and that the median APCs paid are higher than the median listed fees for both gold and hybrid. Our approach addresses major limitations in previous efforts to estimate APCs paid and offers much needed insight into an otherwise opaque aspect of the business of scholarly publishing. We call upon publishers to be more transparent about OA fees.

arXiv.org

Another great collaboration with colleagues at the #ScholCommLab: @stefhaustein @juancommander @leighbutler , Maddie, and Nina

APC dataset: >36,000 data points from 8,712 journals by six publishers, 2019-2023. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CR1MMV.

Open dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) of gold and hybrid journals published by Elsevier, Frontiers, MDPI, PLOS, Springer-Nature and Wiley 2019-2023

This open dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) was produced from the price lists of six large scholarly publishers (Elsevier, Fronti...

Harvard Dataverse

@eschares @OpenAlex

Imagine if all those funds had gone to our university libraries instead, in diamond open access models. Not only universities would have saved many times that sum from not needing any subscription to publishers, but also, the general public would be able to access all papers without any paywalls.

#academia #ScientificPublishing

@eschares @OpenAlex the pay-to-'win' MDPI strategy is starting to show
@eschares @OpenAlex Am i reading section 3.3 correctly, that the "listed" distributions are the listed price across all journals for that publisher, and the "paid" distributions are the distributions of numbers of papers published in those journals? If that's right it took me a minute to figure out what you meant there, i kept thinking that meant that journal X lists its price at $2k but people actually paid $2.5k to publish in journal X, like a mismatch between list price and actual payment. the "or publishers charge higher APCs for popular journals" was the thing that made it click in my mind (mentioning this in case you are looking for amateur reader clarity feedback on the preprint <3, thanks for the work)
@jonny @OpenAlex Not quite, we had a lot of discussion on how best to show this so the feedback is appreciated! That section and violin plots are supposed to show the distribution of APCs publishers *offer* (list in blue) vs what authors actually *choose* (paid in orange). So for Frontiers, their journal portfolio has the most common APC around $2,000 (blue), but authors choose to publish in journals with much higher APC (orange). For PLOS it's reversed, most publishing is in PLOS ONE, at $1805.