There is a weirdly racist trend where people blame hypothetical minorities when systems fail because management cuts corners. We saw it with the Boeing door collapse and now with the Crowdstrike crash.

There is no mythical "DEI engineer" doing sloppy work at these companies.

It's down to leadership cutting corners to make a buck. A software update causing a crash that takes down all of your customers is due to inadequate testing. It's not because some anonymous minority wrote the code.

@carnage4life
I personally blame the 10x engineers.
@carnage4life This racist anti-DEI crap generally comes down to two sorts: stupid people who don't know how anything works in the world, and people who know better but who lie to hurt others because they're evil.
@Seilenos @carnage4life

Or lie to deflect from their own culpability (still evil, though).
@carnage4life @Seilenos
The old story: fools and knaves, knaves and fools.
@carnage4life You are totally correct with your analysis here. "Inadequate testing". DevOps and continuous deployment have created a paradigm where changes can be pushed to channel without adequate testing or even 'stop and think' assessments of possible dependencies impact. The product managers often don't understand what they're managing. The goal statements ten years ago included "fail fast, fail cheap" and "cut bureaucracy" but this is the result.
@milennialzero @carnage4life

A Real™ devops pipeline has the testing in place to catch things – at least those that are anticipatable. Competent organizations do what they can to minimize the blast-radius of any given failure. As part of that, you don't generally just blast something out to "all the things" at once and you certainly don't do it without a predefined, tested rollback process ready to go.
@milennialzero @carnage4life the “fail cheap” is the issue here, hence why a pure continuous deployment setup in this particular case might be missing an element.

@milennialzero @carnage4life DevOps, Agile or Waterfall, testing *always* gets cut to the bone because management push for earlier and earlier delivery, they insist on ludicrous “happy day” estimation and they perceive testing time as “soft”- as in “if you code it right first time you don’t need all that testing”.

Ridiculous, yes, but I’ve experienced it so many times in 30+ years…

@milennialzero @carnage4life also at the client side, automated updates should be blocked or delayed so that non production env receive them first and can be tested.

I don't know the product but if it didn't allow for such a scenario, I wouldn't used it in a critical env.

@milennialzero @carnage4life But but but ... the CI/CD pipeline contains testing steps, for example the step that signs the content should, surely, refuse to do so if the earlier step that validates format has failed? So it shouldn't matter what crap is fed into the beginning of the pipeline, it shouldn't make it through to the end.
@carnage4life People think that? Seriously?
@anne_twain @carnage4life I've seen it come up over and over online. People will be talking about an engineering catastrophe and someone has to get an advertisement in for their racism. Or some other bigotry. Sometimes they complain it's because of feminism, or trans people or pronouns, or whatever thing they're hung up on.

@anne_twain @carnage4life I think the general idea they're usually getting at is that in the good old days, people were judged on *merit* and *results*, but now there are all these other political considerations and it leads to substandard hiring.

But the only way someone could believe that is if they completely ignore all of the old-boy-network, overtly bigoted and "I like the cut of your jib" considerations that skewed hiring 50 or 100 years ago (and that still operate today, just with less overt social sanction). One could maybe argue that the answer isn't DEI as currently practiced, that there is some better way--but this isn't how the "DEI engineer" complaint is framed.

@carnage4life
I think most everyone knows this, except for the people in rural America whose only "news" source is Facebook, which is where they "learn" that DEI is corrupting every business and institution.

A lot of the people spreading that nonsense know it's false too, but they are happy to spread it because they're white supremacists

@jrefior @carnage4life I don't agree. I saw a man that I thought was very well-educated, has a master's and travels internationally to give talks at conference. He was spouting that he thinks DEI caused the Crowdstrike crash.

racism is not just a poor uneducated rural thing

@theelectricteal @jrefior @carnage4life

I agree with @theelectricteal . The belief that certain non-White ethnicities are intrinsically "less than" is deeply ingrained and pervasive. That I didn't get accepted to college because my excellent school grades warranted it, but that I was given a pass because I'm Black. That my having a well paying job wasn't because I worked hard to get there, but because it ticked off a, "have to hire a Black person," box.

I've had people say to my face that whatever I accomplish is an empty label given only because I'm Black, dismissing that whatever I accomplish is real, and due to my work and effort.

My experiences have been with educated people, living in large, racially diverse cities. Racism truly is not just a poor, uneducated, rural thing.

@Nmyownworld @theelectricteal
I suppose I should have written my post better, because I agree with both of you.

Part of my point was that the well-educated person spouting the DEI nonsense is more likely to be the determined white supremacist who knows it's false. This is from my own life experience. I grew up in a rural town and my mom still lives there. Some of the people there believe the false "news" they get on Facebook, in part because nothing they see contradicts it.

@Nmyownworld @theelectricteal
But a (former) close friend from college, and (Federalist Society) acquaintances in law school, and other well-educated white people I've known were determined, Machiavellian white supremacists. They knew the propaganda they were spreading (great replacement, cultural marxism, etc.) was false (clear especially with the former close friend). They were frequent liars. But they were extremely enthusiastic, strategic, and vehement spreaders of this propaganda.
@carnage4life Who needs engineers when you have MBAs!?!
@carnage4life Engineers don't run companies. "Leaders" run companies. The company acted the way it did because that's the way leaders wanted it to run.

@david1 @carnage4life
Too many people forget this.

It's as though despite all the money given to CEOs for their leadership, they don't actually understand leadership.

@carnage4life people claiming this are showing their ass. Remember the names and never hire them

@heathborders @carnage4life

It's possible that a lot of the comments are made by bots and troll farms. It's predictable that there is an increase in a US election year.

@carnage4life
Besides, the minorities aren't there anymore because SCOTUS took Affirmative Action away. And then came the tech layoffs, one after another, back-to-back, most of them in securities development, because such responsibilities were deemed unnecessary. There's no minorities to blame because Big Tech fired them all.

@carnage4life
This is a manifestation of what I like to call "one track mindlessness" - the tendency of simpletons to see everything that ever happens in terms of whatever their pet issue is.

Someone obsessively and brainlessly anti-DEI will attribute everything bad that ever happens to DEI, without any evidence or inkling of an indication that there's any relationship there at all, let alone a casual one.

@digyoursoul

@carnage4life

I feel like I'm missed a facepalm-worthy story, somewhere.
@carnage4life I try to shut those idiots down every time I see them, not because I think they'll change, but so that others see me shutting them down.

@carnage4life it's funny because nobody (besides us) mentioned the fact that the one thing in common with CrowdStrike and McAfee bringing down the 'net is the CEO was the same.

But sure, "diversity" is the problem 🥲

@carnage4life agreed. I was doing research into why leadership is so poor with tech. That’s a long conversation but leadership knows nothing but presumes to know everything is almost universally the issue.
@carnage4life I'm betting they do have an extensive and completely automated test system for all of this. But it all comes to naught when a "trivial" last minute change is introduced to satisfy an important customer. Especially when management decides to skip the bulk of the testing in order to meet that bonus generating shipping date.
@carnage4life I can believe that people might have legitimate issues with those programs and their design. But the minute someone opens their mouth and describes a person as being "DEI", I instantly know what their real problem is, and what their priorities are. The concept that only white people can be qualified to do the job and anyone else is some charity "DEI" hire is literally white supremacy.

@dutch_connection_uk @carnage4life

I guess I'm not up to date with USA racist jargon. Can somebody explain what "DEI" stands for?

@javierg @carnage4life Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion. Companies would have special hiring events for disabled people and such, what people miss is that you still have to get through a tough interview, it's about getting a resume past the automated garbage can, not about bypassing merit entirely.

But now the right wing uses the term to imply someone was hired because of minority status, rather than merit, and they do that for elected officials as well, including in majority black districts.

@carnage4life wow, there is such blame already going around? ffs
@carnage4life The ones responsible need a scapegoat, that's how capitalism collapses into fascism. It's simply when the wealthy successfully redirect the anger that rightfully should go towards them towards minorities, immigrants and other marginalised groups.
@carnage4life it's not only because inadequate testing. There are also other processes to blame like designing, coding, and releasing. In general, it's a processes problem and that's management fault.

@carnage4life To be fair; It _was_ likely caused by a person lifted to a position due to their gender, while being unqualified for it, prioritizing things unrelated to the task over doing a technically sound job:

In all likelihood some (group) of (probably white) guy people populating (upper) management, having gotten there through connections, generational wealth, and simple unfounded over-confidence, prioritizing profit over safety, care, and proper engineering...

But conceptually...

@carnage4life
#Capitalism letting you down? Shift the blame to the underclass!
It's a tactic that's been working for 400 years
@carnage4life I've been called so many things - including racist - for arguing that DEI is a good thing and *not* the reason any of this happened. If anything, I'd argue that companies doing DEI right and for the right reasons are more likely to make good choices in other areas too.
All the yelling about DEI being "a disaster" seems to be coming from people who are secretly afraid they wouldn't make it if faced with a level playing field. And most of them would probably be right.
@carnage4life I mean the minority I blame wholeheartedly are billionaires
@carnage4life I saw someone mention a DEI engineer on the bird app and I just thought “that’s enough of this app for me today”
@carnage4life That AND our addiction to this update fetish in the ridiculous belief that it adds to security and stability. It -can- when there are needs that really need to be addressed and the proper care and testing is done. Just pumping out monthly updates to keep up with the Jone's though, and corporations everywhere signing up for them sight unseen. That was always going to lead to something like this as companies consolidate and grow insane marketshare.
@carnage4life prepare to hear a lot about the “dei vice president”…

@carnage4life OMG, please tell me that they're not ... oh, nope, they are.

I am so absolutely done with these bigots.

@carnage4life IMO, DEI is one of the keys for preventing such issues. Because the more eyes are looking at software, the better it is in the end.
@carnage4life my favorite was blaming the mayor of Baltimore for the bridge disaster. Like he personally snuck into the boat overnight and started unplugging things.
@carnage4life people i know who've been in the trenches can tell a lot of stories about shit tier white bros working at tech companies who got there because they had family money for brand name education/nepotism so it's probably not that lmao
@carnage4life them feeling the urgent need to be racist so badly that they have to point fingers at a completely hypothetical minority and say "that one! they did it!" is so flamingly racist it's been in use for as long as they couldn't just say "no <slur>s" and call it a day

@carnage4life And 99% of the time it's a white dude in the C suite who made the calls to:

1. Reduce staff numbers
2. Reduce code reviews (whether by peers or managers)
3. Reduce QA standards
4. Push hotfixes to production

And, in this particular case, wasn't it a C-suite honky who sold a whole bunch of shares the night before the shit hit the proverbial?

@carnage4life I'm taking your statement and raise it up. From my experience, this kind of stuff doesn't happen because of inadequate testing. It happens because an engineer proposed a safe solution to management and they chose to ignore it due to artificial budget or time constraints. Then, management will throw their devs under the bus for doing "shody work" as they are an "agile" team that's supposed to "self organize" to avoid this kind of issue. In fact, they probably already did.
@carnage4life the fact you even have to say this is so depressing.

@carnage4life agreed, as someone who follows aviation, it's kind of insane how you see those kinds of DEI comments on EVERY incident. Whether it's an airline pilot or ATC, it's always DEI.

Remember when Boeing Max-9s were self-crashing? Boeing's CEO was victim-blaming non-American pilots for being inferior.

Sexism is frequently part if it, regardless of race when there's a female pilot, someone's mentioning DEI. How to say you're sexist without saying you're sexist, 101.