What is your favorite alternative voting system?

[Notes: • If you vote in one poll in this thread please vote in all of them • For a real world example of what I mean by "Multiround runoff" consider the French system]

Condorcet
15.8%
Instant Runoff
48.6%
Approval
23.3%
Multiround runoff
12.3%
Poll ended at .

What is your favorite alternative voting system? (Poll #2)

[Notes: • If you vote in one poll in this thread please vote in all of them • For a real world example of what I mean by "Multiround runoff" consider the French system]

Condorcet
21.1%
Instant Runoff
39.2%
Approval
20.6%
Multiround runoff
19.1%
Poll ended at .

@mcc I voted for IRV, because I don't want to have to explain Condorcet to the general public for the marginal benefit it offers, though it is better.

Practically, I prefer Single Transferable Vote.

@sagefault STV always struck me as categorically different, isn't it kind of a version of a proportional voting system for a whole parliament?

@mcc STV is more of a way to try and give a voice to the political minority in a bunch of electoral districts.

For example, where I live one party has a lock on my electoral district, so about 40% of the population is permanently disenfranchised. STV bundles three districts like mine together so that there's someone to speak for them.

@sagefault that's cool, it requires a vote for multiple offices in multiple districts though right? It can't be used for select for a single unitary office like a President (I'm willing to accept the argument that offices like that shouldn't exist)

@mcc True. It is entirely for certain types of elections.

However, because the user-facing part of it looks just like IRV/RCV, you can easily combine STV of representatives with IRV of a president without confusing anyone.

@sagefault oh, that is a good point

@mcc @sagefault yeah, my understanding is that IRV is the degenerate single-representative case of STV.

Here in Australia, we've got a single-member district (federal) lower-house and a multi-member (12 per state, rolling 6 per election) upper house; the voting works the same in both cases, just that the lower-house quota is 50% and the upper-house quota is 12.5%.

(States do different things; for example, in Tasmania we have a 7-member-per-electorate lower house)

@RAOF @sagefault i have to admit it seems a little odd to me that Australia's doing everything I believe a democracy ought to be doing re: electoral reform yet every Australian I know is so unhappy with their local politics

@mcc @sagefault I suspect it is a universal condition to be unhappy with one's local politics.

Our local politics is HOLY SHITBALLS better than US or UK politics.