https://daringfireball.net/linked/2024/07/09/intelligent-speed-nagging
@Transportist @daringfireball I had the same thought. A person who enjoys the walkability of an old city — somewhat unusual in the California-dominated tech press — complaining about ensuring cars don’t speed.
The better answer to the “nagging” criticism is not to give people the option — why allow people to choose to be able to drive too fast? (Unless it’s a reliability issue.)
Attached: 1 image IMPORTANT STUDY: “On average, the implementation of 30 km/h speed limits in European cities demonstrated a 23%, 37%, and 38% reduction in road crashes, fatalities, and injuries respectively. Lower speed limits also yielded environmental benefits, with emissions decreasing on average by 18%, and fuel consumption by 7%, indicating enhanced fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact.” https://www.nrso.ntua.gr/review-of-city-wide-30-kmh-speed-limit-benefits-in-europe-may-2024/
@Transportist My opinions on this are not in contradiction at all. I strongly favor pedestrian-oriented street and intersection design, speed bumps, low speed limits in cities, congestion pricing in big cities, and the repurposing of street parking for other uses. I'd also be far less opposed to a mandate that cars simply cannot exceed posted speed limits, especially within cities.
This EU law just annoys drivers, though. It doesn't prevent drivers from going as fast as the car will go.