š Via Katie Phang:
NEW: @senwhitehouse sends a letter to AG Merrick Garland requesting that he appoint a Special Counsel to investigate Justice #ClarenceThomas for his alleged violations of federal ethics and tax laws.
š Via Katie Phang:
NEW: @senwhitehouse sends a letter to AG Merrick Garland requesting that he appoint a Special Counsel to investigate Justice #ClarenceThomas for his alleged violations of federal ethics and tax laws.
So wish he had become Judiciary Chairman!

Raises an interesting legal question. If he broke the law, is he immune? š
If not now, give Chief Justice Roberts time...he will be!
@lizopp @GottaLaff thereās no better time to begin accountability than now. Yes, itās a shame itās taken so long for literally anything to happen about this, but itās not too late. And it could be just beginning, so who knows if itāll be too little.
Though the wheels of justice turn very slowly, turn they do :)
@GottaLaff Also signed by Oregon senator Ron Wyden! š
Aren't the more discrete bribes well past the statute of limitations? The RV financing, the free house for his mother, the tuition for his adopted "nephew"? The more current stuff like getting hosted and flown on a billionaire's yacht and plane for a free vacation in indonesia, are harder to define as crimes.
Whoop-te-do. And it takes only one house to impeach, the House. But it takes 67 senators to convict and remove. Name me the 17 GOP senators who will vote to convict. Though I'll grant that if there's a republican president, they might cynically decide ol' Clarence Sale's getting a little long in the tooth and decide to replace him with someone in their 50s.
@Wileymiller @GottaLaff
I know he will start the process and make a thorough go of it. And it wonāt be quick and it wonāt be satisfying because thatās not how legal processes work; they are uncertain.
Iāll take the win that a referral has been made at all.
And the win of making a list publicly available of the bribes.
@schmubba
That's what I thought during the J6 committee hearings, especially when they closed with the committee BEGGING the DOJ to launch an investigation, but Garland sat around for 2 years doing nothing except for going after the low hanging fruit of the rioters. And the only reason he appointed Jack Smith as special prosecutor is when Trump announced his candidacy. If Trump didn't do that, nothing would have happened.
Sorry, but I've lost all faith in Garland doing ANYTHING.
@Wileymiller @GottaLaff
Appreciate how you feel. I felt similarly (but in addition to what you expressed below, I felt helpless to get anyone to do anything about it).
The more I learn about how large scale investigations work, the more I think I was mistaken about nothing being done. I mistook assignment of Jack Smith as the start of the investigation. Jackās assignment happened when independence was required to continue to proceed with the ongoing investigation.
Iām probably not helping much to reduce your anxiety, I know.
And I do in some small way understand where youāre coming from on this.
Your strips do a lot of heavy lifting for us all in these crazy times. Thanks for all the great work.
@GottaLaff I saw that. I was hoping for televised public Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, which would bring the point home to the voters. Is there some formal protocol reason why he chose to do it this way?
It seems to me Garland is unlikely to do this. I think they'd much prefer to keep any such investigations secret rather than appoint a special counsel that will be subject to intense political pressure. We didn't find out about the Menendez case until the indictments happened.
@GottaLaff I thought he was just collecting gratuities after making rulings. Remember, the court ruled that getting bribes after the fact is not corruption.
I'm surprised they have not granted themselves immunity for murder,rape and drunk driving.
Excellent. No man is above the law.