If the NY Times published its neurology doctor story knowing it would fuel misleading innuendo, as I'm now starting to believe, this is akin to the way the Murdoch family's Fox "News" behaves routinely.

This would transcend malpractice -- again, if what seems to be the case truly is the case -- into something deeply malevolent.

The Times has long needed a public editor with the authority to demand answers -- which is the obvious reason why they ditched that job years ago.

@dangillmor This is the audience the Times is catering to these days. This was a response to the Parkinson’s story. As far as being a reliable source of news they are no better than NEWSMAX. #nytimes #usPolitics

@rob11563 @dangillmor

Would if I had one!

@darwinwoodka @rob11563 @dangillmor

Tempted to sign up for one just so I can cancel it. With feedback.

@rob11563
I hope that everyone is boycotting NYT and MSM in general.
I just gave someone a heads up that if you are continuing to play wordle, then they are still getting paid, and she got mad at me. 🤣
Then we parted ways...
@palin @rob11563 Cancelled Washington Post and New York Times a couple of years ago. No regrets. They are much worse now.
I unsubscribed to ABC yesterday. Their "breaking news" on the Parkinson's lie was the last straw.
#corporatemedia
@Barbramon1
At this point MSM... almost all of it, is powered by Putin/U.S. Ogliarch propaganda.
And they are the enemy.