Architectural prizes shouldn't be awarded till 10 years after buildings open - then ask folk who use, maintain & operate it how successful it is. I work in a shiny building that won prizes 10 yrs ago & it's a maintenance nightmare with no storage that costs fortune to run
@anon_opin @CiaraNi Indeed, I often used to say that the first aim of architects was to win prizes!!
@DrPKR @anon_opin I've worked in a few 'state-of-the-art' buildings that were designed as architectural flagships, but full of features that didn't take basic human behaviour and needs into account so (for example) big fancy 'collaborative' spaces were never used and became wastelands or overly technological solutions, like temperature settings, didn't work. One of the buildings won an award. :-)
@CiaraNi @DrPKR @anon_opin
I so wish this was the case. It runs all the way down into education, where we need to teach aspiring young architects how to engage properly with users
#ArchitectureOfCare
@kerstinsailer True, it is so important.
@DrPKR @anon_opin

@CiaraNi @DrPKR @anon_opin
This is what we're up against - architects considering users as a threat

Taken from the slides of my inaugural professorial lecture in March 2024, available to view here:

https://vimeo.com/925814729

#ArchitectureOfCare #SociologyOfArchitecture

Professor Kerstin Sailer Inaugural Lecture

Vimeo
@kerstinsailer The 'user' as 'positive threat' - very interesting, thank you for sharing these. @DrPKR @anon_opin