CandyKJul 3, 2024
The Supreme Court just gave the convicted felon a greenlight to be a dictator if he returns to our White House I still don't think some Americans understand just how dangerous and what a disaster this would be with the destruction of our democracy the #SCOTUS has crown themselves King and hoping for a King Trump presidency and white media want to distract you about one bad debate from #POTUS while our rights are being stripped away and worse Nothing else matters more then stopping Trump.WAKE-UP
Show threadJessica 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)Jul 3, 2024
@lovelylovely Trump is a pawn, members of SCOTUS are pawns also. The organisation that controls them are known to everyone but no one has ever held them accountable for their historical atrocities, and that's not going to change anytime soon.
Show threadJayJul 3, 2024
@jessica_fey @lovelylovely And what organization is that?
Show threadJessica 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)Jul 3, 2024
@WhiteCatTamer @lovelylovely Religious organisations, church. They are the ones endorsing Trump. They have lots of money,power and influence.
Show threadJayJul 3, 2024

@jessica_fey @lovelylovely That’s more of a concept than an organization, so this continues to read like defeatist conspiracy theory thinking than anything else. No one is going to kill Christianity; famously, it’s been tried before.

If you’re looking for specifics so you and the audience know which politicians’ platforms to reject or support, the Federalist Society is responsible for several SCOTUS seats, as they have been grooming legal students for that precise purpose.

Show threadJessica 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)Jul 3, 2024
@WhiteCatTamer @lovelylovely I didn't say anything about killing Christianity but holding church accountable. Did humanity hold church accountable when they accused women of witchcraft and burnt them? Did humanity hold them accountable for torturing and murdering scientists? How about killing lgbtqia people? How about the time they funded Nazis? Yes, you can call this a conspiracy theory because there is no evidence but if there was, do you think humanity would still hold them accountable? Or just walk by and forget?
Show threadJayJul 3, 2024

@jessica_fey @lovelylovely Yeah so my criticism of this is more that it’s an amorphous sense of righteous indignation that is impossible to satisfy than that injustice should be ignored. And therein lies defeatism.

Again; focus on the current organizations that are doing active and willing harm, and watch how they operate in order to stop or hinder them. No one is hauling dead popes into court (anymore, lol) but you CAN support stronger walls between church and state.

Show threadJessica 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)
@WhiteCatTamer @lovelylovely Yes focusing on the current threat is correct and that is what everyone do but leaving the underlying problem unresolved will always end the same way. And I'm not talking about bringing the dead pope or archbishops to court, but holding the church accountable for their current injustice in global scale. For example, in Australia we have been waiting for anti discrimination bill amendments for 25 years, and current government shelved it again because of church and archbishop push back. The current situation in US is a result of ignoring the underlying problem, and nothing is going to change if they continue to ignore it.
Jul 3, 2024 at 8:18pmWeb