Inside of two weeks, SCOTUS has given itself authority to:

- cancel legislation it doesn't like
- overrule regulatory bodies it doesn't agree with
- and after the fact legalize actions taken by a President.

Given that it's already got final say on the actions of the rest of the judiciary, that now consolidates the power of all three branches of American government under the authority of the Supreme Court.

In other words? It's a judicial coup.

Revolutions have been fought over less.

@AnarchoNinaWrites As annoyed as I am by taking example from Andrew Jackson, Supreme Court decisions are not worth the ink if the other two branches don’t care for them.
@MyLittleMetroid Absolutely; but this is the same government that responded to anti-Dobbs protests by making it extra illegal to picket outside SCOTUS judge's offices and homes - so don't hold your breath.
@AnarchoNinaWrites I’m not. But it should be clear that power here is based purely on other people agreeing to enforce it.
@MyLittleMetroid Hey I'm all for disbanding the court/driving these folks into the sea; but let's be clear - you're going to have to fight our government, ALL of it, to get there.

@AnarchoNinaWrites that’s why I was mentioning Andrew Jackson. The Supreme Court told him to leave the Cherokee alone and he just ignored them. Roosevelt got close enough to doing the same about the new deal where the court just started agreeing with him a lot more. A bit too much tbh (see Japanese internment).

Of course I’d rather take that approach for less disgusting reasons.

@AnarchoNinaWrites tl;dr all politics are about power relations

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀 Always have been.

@MyLittleMetroid If worms had machine guns, birds would be nervous. Nothing short of a popular uprising is changing this, and that popular uprising will be opposed by both the "liberal" and fascist wings of our government.

@AnarchoNinaWrites I hope that you're wrong and we can pull things off the brink without things getting to that, but it's hard to be optimistic about it lately.

I guess the proof will be on whether the vast majority of folks who aren't thinking too hard about this get enough of an idea to keep things from going over the cliff come voting time (and agreed that by itself won't fix much).

@MyLittleMetroid There is no vote to make that will break the power of the court; Biden and the Dems have made it clear their plan is to respect the court and wait for fascists/conservative judges to die.

@AnarchoNinaWrites Unfortunately the "stuff the court" constituency has gotten nowhere near majority numbers although it would be the least disruptive way to fix the problem quickly.

But the Roosevelt years do show that the court can and will walk back if the alternative is for everyone to just don't give a damn about what they say.

@MyLittleMetroid Roosevelt is dead; you have THIS actually existing Democratic Party and the ACTUALLY existing Joe Biden.
@AnarchoNinaWrites Don't want to give the guy much credit here but the bigger problem is in the Senate.
@MyLittleMetroid I'm pretty sure a 6-3 fascist high court usurping all three branches of government constitutes a pretty "big problem" - not sure we're talking about anything relevant, anymore.

@AnarchoNinaWrites Nah it's a good conversation, I'm just looking it in a more "how would we go about fixing this without the revolution" kind of way.

Technically speaking this could be sorted out in half a week by a Congress that actually cared about enforcing its own power, but there's too many folks there who benefit or whose circle of friends benefit from the status quo, so I guess it's going to be revolution or close to it 🤷🏻‍♂️

@MyLittleMetroid @AnarchoNinaWrites And if Arthur, son of Uther, Rightful King of All England came back from a Avalon, he could reinstate Camelot and save England from their current government.

Both this example and yours are equally likely, as neither "hero" exists in this world.