In the ever-more noxious New York Times, Jamelle Bouie is the singular voice of sanity, context, and intelligence, here defending each against the onslaught of Times columnists looking for blood. Skip over everybody else and read him. Gift link.
h/t @CartyBoston https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/biden-democrats-debate.html?unlocked_article_code=1.3U0.FAfj._t38zHh8bpfy&smid=em-share
Opinion | ‘Is It Too Late?’ Four Writers on What Democrats Should Do About Biden.

None of the options ensure victory against Trump — and some of them could badly split the party.

The New York Times
.@jbouie: "I’ll be the fly in the ointment of this emerging consensus that Biden should drop out. I don’t think one has to excuse or apologize for the president’s poor debate performance to also observe that the hyperventilating panic obscures the extent to which there are serious, perhaps fatal downsides to Biden leaving the race at this stage."
Bouie: "But why, exactly, should Harris step aside? Why should Harris not be considered the presumptive nominee on account of her service as vice president and her presence on the 2020 ticket? And should Harris be muscled out, how does this affect a new nominee’s relationship with key parts of the Democratic base, specifically those Black voters for whom Harris’s presence on the ticket was an affirmation of Biden’s political commitment to their communities?"
@jeffjarvis Whatever deficiencies Kamala has a candidate can be remedied by her choice of running mate, just as she had done for Biden. Put Buttigieg on the ticket, send him over to Fox News to do hour-long interviews every week between now and November. Problem solved. Because there was not a contested primary, there's no way the party could possibly dump Harris at the convention without catastrophic revolt.