Dear mastodon,

My teenager did an uh-oh.

And now we need a new computer monitor.

Previously, we would search “best gaming monitors 2024”

But now I know that #enshittification is a thing, and I trust no-site.

Can you all please recommend a non- #AI generated evaluation of best value-for-money monitors website? #Reviews

Thank you, Humans 🙏!

A

@atthenius
Don't put too much emphasis on the "Gaming" label as an indication of quality.

"Gaming" typically only refers to the "Refresh rate", and a 4k monitor with a 240Hz Refresh Rate is meaningless if you don't also have a video card capable of drawing 240 4K fps (frames per second.) That's some rarified air.

"Bigger is better" is also a popular misconception. Rule-of-thumb: If you have to turn your head, IT'S TOO BIG.

@MugsysRapSheet I agree. "Gaming" is code for fast response rate and top (or next to top) resolution for games. But nothing particularly fancy-pants.

I also always think about…
human eyes on average refresh is 60 Hz, and blinks are 120Hz... (medi-mastodon, disavow me of my antiquated notions if req’d)... so 240 Hz is kinda overkill.

I'm more asking about my experience as a cross windows-osx person... who sees that osx devices invariably are easy on the eyes (at least for coding if not etal).

@atthenius @MugsysRapSheet I think that is over simplified. The eye brain combo is very complex and the exact behaviour of the display technology matters a lot too. LCDs generally hold one image until they display the next which means that they don’t dim between frames which affects the ability of the brain to interpolate so apparent sharpness of moving images should be higher with frame rates greater than 60Hz. 50-60Hz is about the limit of ability to perceive the flicker with CRTs.